While this makes sense and I fully support ADSA, I find myself asking a few questions. 1. First year palang ako nagkakaroon na ng mga Human Auction na ito. And since Human Auctions are usually org-related events, doesnt that mean that the Office of Student Affairs had to approve these events? I am not too familiar with the procedures, but dont you need a signature of approval before you could even post a flyer on the billboards on EDSA walk? Therefore, with bigger things such as Human Auctions, it would make sense that organizations need more than a signature of approval. 2. Honestly, natutuwa ako na sinita nila tayo, it shows how the institution cares for our moral formation. But what prompted this? After all those years of Human Auctions happening in the campus, what happened that prompted this? 3. The provision under Section III-B implies that moral damage was done on a person, and the memo adds that this applies whether the damage was done intentionally or unintentionally. Thats honestly a very broad statement. In a sense, any one of us could have violated Section III-B as long as someone feels bad. My question now is this, to follow my 2nd question: During all those years of Human Auctions, did nobody feel that they were being debased or morally injured?
Posted on: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 00:16:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015