William Taylor Reil Exposed The methods of the Criminal Elite have been known & exposed for a long time. Divide & Conquer IS the cornerstone of their methodology followed by obfuscation, lying, cheating, stealing, brainwashing, lying some more, ransom, exploitation, blackmail & when all else fails, lie some more. I dont want to bore you with a long rebuttal of Mr. Reils expose, however, I DO want to provide more substance then he does in NLA Exposed. See Exhibit A. I also want to let it be known that WE ARE All in this together & each one of us plays a critical & unique role in this divine plan. As always, treat others as you wish to be treated. Now for a few brass tacks: 1. As pointed in Exhibits 1 & 2, Mr. Reil has aligned himself with Sheriff Mack. Remember, WE ARE ALL in this together and each has a unique role. This, however, does not mean that we should abandon critical thinking & discernment. 2. I agree with Mr. Reil that education, networking & organization are first priorities. Havent these three elements been thoroughly addressed by NLA? Have you read the Plan? Mr. Reil places a great deal of emphasis upon doing everything in the correct order. My contention is that the Grand Juries MUST be Constituted simultaneously with having Constitutional Sheriff(s) who will perform their constitutional duties as well as lawful militia(s). The major basis for NLA positions is United States v. Williams states Mr. Reil. Think about this statement. Indeed, U.S. v. Williams is one tenet cited by NLA, however, arent the major tenets Article 6, Paragraph 2, the Supremacy Clause (which says the Constitution and the laws pursuant thereto and the treaties which shall be made under the authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law of the Land and Amendment V (No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise, infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.? Why the obfuscation? Then there is the question about differences between Federal Grand Juries & State Grand Juries. Is this not a question of jurisdiction, not a question of false positions and statements? Mr. Reil writes: I sincerely recommend that everyone immediately reject the fraudulent NLA Plan -totally. He offers 9 (nine) points in Appendix A. Some of them are good points, however, do they support an indictment of fraud? They are just good, valid questions (example: How are the Jurors, their families and their property going to be protected if the Juror takes any action?) Using fear to make a point is bereft of critical thinking. Asking valid questions does not provide evidence of fraud. I regret that I do not have more time to address each one of his points. In Summary: Mr. Reil asks many good questions which demand answers. We must work together, support each others true efforts and eschew division, ridicule and mockery. We shall have justice, honor & mercy. We shall prevail. Stephen, acting Colorado Coordinator Exhibit A: sheriffbrigadesofpenn/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/National-Liberty-Alliance-Exposed.pdf Exhibit 1: Please read all comments, especially the one from Fran Tully where she quotes Mack as saying he could justify anything for money. His collecting donations after he dropped out of the race is documented. From: Dale Williams Date: April 17, 2014 at 10:50:36 PM MDT To: Dale Williams Subject: FW: Richard Mack inserts other foot in mouth -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Richard Mack inserts other foot in mouth From: ebeye7@gmail Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:12:15 -0600 Well, for the love of God, will someone (with cred) PLEASE inform Stuart Rhodes so he doesn’t drag down that group??? W On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Franc Tully wrote: I went to the national LP convention that year, a month AFTER I pulled him from the ballot, and he was still soliciting donations for Governor. I had to personally go to people and tell them that he was out of the race, do not give him any money. At the same time, he was filming for a TV show, who wants to be President or some such nonsense. He is an affable guy, but his moral compass is whacked out. He told me he can justify anything for money. Said keeping his family fed was his number one priority. As if that was supposed to make all his lawbreaking OK. Fran Tully Freshwater Organics On 4/17/14 3:18 PM, john ozberkmen wrote: Which of course puts a heavy shadow on Oath Keepers as well. I personally witnessed Mack saying he was still running for governor, after he quit, in order to take more donations. Hold on to your wallet if you ever have dealings with him. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: turpenaaron@gmail Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:10:35 -0600 Subject: Re: Richard Mack inserts other foot in mouth Mack has been a long time, outspoken talk about freedom and get paid guy. He ran Prepaid Legal for Governor back when a bunch of us walked off his campaign in 2004. Hes a one-trick pony who produces badly-written books and lives off the glory of something he (sort of) did twenty years ago that doesnt even have his name on it. This is gaffe is all him, Im sure. Its not the first time hes said stupid things in public and then tried to back out of it. Hes currently somehow employed by the Oathkeepers, I believe. --Aaron AaronTurpen AaronOnAutos co-founder CarNewsCafe On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Walt Appel wrote: Mack has been a long time outspoken “freedom, rights and etc.” kind of guy. Any suppositions on why the serious gaffe? Who’e he really working for? Walt On Apr 17, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Daniel Newby wrote: Guys, Theres an old Chinese proverb: If you wait by the river long enough, youll see the bodies of your enemies float by. We sure didnt have to wait long for Dick Mack to float by! Daniel talkingpointsmemo/muckraker/richard-mack-interview-human-sheilds TPM Interview: Ex-Sheriff Says He Was Wrong About Bundy Ranchs Human Shields YouTube DYLAN SCOTT – APRIL 17, 2014, 6:00 AM EDT Richard Mack, a former Arizona county sheriff, was one of the better known activists to voice support for Bundy Ranch during its long-running standoff with federal officials over cattle grazing rights. In recent days, as tensions rose, he eventually made his way up to the Nevada ranch to join the fight. In an interview with TPM on Wednesday, Mack portrayed a scene where the protesters genuinely believed they could be killed by federal agents at any moment. But he also backed off one of the more striking claims hed made during the standoff. He caught national attention on Monday when he said the protesters were strategizing to put all the women up at the front in case the federal officials fired on them. He later said it was a tactical ploy that I was trying to get them to use. But Mack backtracked somewhat and told TPM he was mistaken when he said those things. The women had volunteered to go to the front, he said. The mistake I made was it was never a strategy. It was never strategized. It was never talked about. The women just did it, he said. I was never privy to that, so I thought they did strategize that. I thought that would be the only way they would send women up to the front. TPM: First, I wanted to ask how you heard about Bundy Ranch and why it interested you. Richard Mack: Theres probably not too many people there who could say this, but Ive known the Bundys for about 20 years. Its because of my involvement in the freedom movement. I was asked to speak at a lot of land rights and states rights meetings, and Clive Bundy was there. Could you talk a little bit about what you found when you got up there? One of our CSPOA (Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, which Mack founded) members who was there earlier and got there before I did was phoning me and telling me that they were going to be killed. The federal snipers, several of them -- I dont know if you know this -- but they were paid mercenaries. Theyre contractors. Theyre paid hit men. He saw all the equipment and all the military weaponry that they had, and then he said, Sheriff, they warned us that they were going to arrest us. Then they warned us that they were going to shoot us. Im calling to tell you that theyre going to shoot us. Hes a 15-year law enforcement veteran that was telling me this. He said, Please tell my wife that I love her, and I hope to see you later, but I dont think so. I, at that time, went around the two lanes of traffic onto the side of the road, which is illegal to do, and I turned on my flashers. I buzzed it up there, and I got there right after that part finished, where my guy was that called me. The sheriff had just left, and he was the one that I think made a big difference. All the people that were there watching, it was about 600, 700 people. My son and I stood there and watched in reverence at one of the most patriotic moments Ive ever been a part of. There was about 500 people, all with tears running down their cheeks, watching these cowboys and cowgirls take these cattle back to their proper place. So had the situation more or less diffused by the time you got there? Um, mostly. Yeah, I would say mostly. There were still a couple of tense moments. All the agents hadnt left yet. It looked like they were still trying to get in the way a little bit. But there were a couple of deputy sheriffs there watching them, and they pulled back. They definitely pulled back. So either while you were there or in talking to other people, did they also give the impression or did you get the impression that it was a life-or-death situation? Yes. One of the reporters from Fox, he was more of a camera man but he had a lot of other capability, he was going around with a camera, and he said, There was no question in my mind that they were going to shoot us. And that seemed to be shared by everybody that was there? Everybody that was there thought the same thing, including the women. One thing that interested me is your idea that this is a pattern following Waco, Ruby Ridge, Kent State. That this all fits in a broader narrative, and the Bundy Ranch situation was one piece of a larger story. Could you elaborate on what you see that larger narrative as? The federal government has been turning off the water to farms in California. The George Bush administration turned off the water in the Klamath Falls Basin in Oregon. Destroying farms and ranchers and mining and logging has been an agenda item with Republican and Democrat presidents and administrations. So were just baffled at all of that. Most Republicans and Democrats have had the same agenda: to diminish the food supply, to go after farmers and ranchers, put them out of business with impunity. Not caring one iota that when they turned off the water to Napa Valley, that affected such a huge part of our food supply, raised the prices of fruits, vegetables and nuts, 50 percent for the entire country. They dont care. I just wonder how these presidents say theyre trying to promote industry in this country, and theyre shutting it down all the time. I just dont get these liars, and their feet arent held to the fire by the national media. Even though some of these media sources actually showed what was happening in Klamath Falls and San Joaquin Valley, and yet nothing happened. I made an announcement that the sheriffs in California should have just gone up to the base of that dam where they shut off the water and turn it on. They can take a court order if they wanted to, but if the judge wont back them up on it, just go do it anyway. Take care of your people. Restore the water. People cant live without water. Put these people back to work and help America all at the same time. It is the federal government that keeps shutting everybody down. And it is the federal government that has shut down 53 ranchers in Clark County (Nev.) alone, except for Mr. Bundy. Hes the 53rd. Hes the last one standing. People, I cannot believe, support this government in any way, shape or form. Anybody who supports that is a crook and a traitor and ought to be sent to Guantanamo Bay. And you really think the government would be willing to kill people to advance their agenda? They have before and they will again. As a law enforcement officer looking at all this, people dont like to get dressed up for the dance and not be able to dance. They wanted to dance. I saw your comments about strategizing to put the women up at the front, in case they did start firing itd be women who were getting shot. I wanted to ask where you got that idea in the first place and why you thought it was a good idea. I never thought it was a good idea. I was kind of surprised by the fact that they did. The mistake I made was it was never a strategy. It was never strategized. It was never talked about. The women just did it. I was never privy to that, so I thought they did strategize that. I thought that would be the only way they would send women up to the front. I didnt suggest it. I didnt want it. I was surprised to see it. When I found out, I was really shocked that they had just gone on their own. Because what I saw was youre saying We were strategizing. Thats what I thought happened, but I was wrong. But there is no question the women were there on every threat that was there with the cowboys and the one that was going to get shot as they went up to the corral to let the cows out. There were women right there. The other thing I had seen was your saying that you had sources in the federal government who said there was still a raid being planned, that this wasnt over. I wanted to confirm that that was true and ask why you think people within the federal government would tell you that. Because theyre really upset about the way the Bundys are being treated and by the underhanded nature of this entire siege. One cop and one federal cop have told us some of the things that theyve overheard and that theyve been privy to. And they dont mind telling us because they dont like whats going on. Have they given you any more details beyond that a raid would still happen? No. In fact, the word is since we exposed it publicly that theyre going back to the drawing board. So to wrap it up, do you think this is over then? No. No, its not. We certainly won a round here, maybe one of the little battles. And I would hope it would be over. Ive asked the federal agents to refuse to go back there, to lay down their arms. They have to be better people than that, to allow their supervisors and this government to put them in a position of shooting law-abiding Americans and to cause another incident like that and to have their names associated with such a disaster and catastrophe. I just cant believe that they could do that. For a paycheck or a pension, you would be willing to do that? I cant believe that they would. Please, put your arms down and go home and tell your supervisors that you wont go do something like that. Do you think, in this situation or another, that bloodshed is inevitable, based on what weve seen in the last week or so? Ive dedicated my life to avoiding and preventing the bloodshed that the federal government keeps pushing the envelope on. I would love for federal bureaucracies to follow the law and follow the Constitution, but they dont. I would love the IRS to stop violating the constitutional rights of Americans. Stop the random audits. Stop the monitoring. Stop the checking, putting innocent people in prisons like theyve done for decades. I would love the NSA to stop doing the illegal wiretapping and monitoring every fax and computer and phone transmission. I would love our federal government to follow the Constitution and Bill of Rights. But theyre not going to. The track record and the history of all of this shows that they wont. That is whats frustrating the American people, that we cant have our own government follow the rules. This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity and length. Photo credit: YouTube. Exhibit 2: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:49:23 -0600 Stephen, I started looking at Reils PDF as suggested by Charlie last night. I had my own suspicions and had already started my own research because of the similarity to Restore the Republic. Our #1 challenge is educating our fellow, We the Peoples. Stick to the original Constitution and Bill of Rights. I have already initiated contact with Colorado 6th Judicial District judge Gregory Limon, he was very helpful with my inquiries of the operation of the Grand Jury. He said, Its all up to the District Attorney, when it comes to the Grand Jury. He also, confirmed that the Grand Jury was a thing of its own. This backs up, Mike Gaddy in Montezuma County and his approach with their DA. We are going to have to work not just with our Sheriffs, but also our DAs and Judges. We have all been Dumbed Down. Greg There is only one supreme tribunal — it is the people themselves. Their sovereign will is expressed through the procedures set forth in the Constitution itself. nationallibertyalliance.org/default.html
Posted on: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 02:41:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015