Yet another revelation which raises a point I cannot grasp. Its okay to present evidence you know is false and to, in effect, suborn perjury if you are a prosecutor? Really? > Well, early on, I decided that anyone who claimed to have witnessed anything was going to be presented to the grand jury. And I knew that no matter how I handled it, there would be criticism of it. So if I didn’t put those witnesses on, then we’d be discussing now why I didn’t put those witnesses on. Even though their statements were not accurate. So my determination was to put everybody on and let the grand jurors assess their credibility, which they did. This grand jury poured their hearts and souls into this. It was a very emotional few months for them. It took a lot of them. I wanted to put everything on there. I thought it was much more important to present everything and everybody, and some that, yes, clearly were not telling the truth. No question about it.
Posted on: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:18:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015