..a stable democracy depends more on boredom and less on rationality. It is the boredom of the masses that is predominantly responsible for the cyclic rotation of power and neither their subjective nor their objective circumstances.Even if a system of governance like monarchy, oligarchy or dictatorship transforms into democracy owing to trigger causes that are related with the emancipation of the majority, it also very soon becomes dependent on boredom for its healthy survival and stability. A large part of any evolving nation feels that only by virtue of Godly intervention can the subjective circumstances in their lives be improved; while they are certain that their objective circumstances are too trivial for Governments to improve as it is occupied with tasks of higher priority. An analogy to the superfluous aggrandization of the democracy can be drawn with the origin of families, which are initiated primarily by boredom of immediate or secondary stakeholders and later given strong social arguments ranging from divine excuses to behavioral arguments to social responsibility justifications; all making the process appear almost sacrosanct. The success of political organizations in a democracy is thus merely restricted to providing strong arguments for the electorate to glorify and subsequently exploit their boredom ..
Posted on: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:37:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015