among a hundred is born one valorous; among a thousand [is born] an intelligent. an orator among ten thousand; a [true]giver, may or may not [be born]! shateShu jAyate shUra, sahasreShu cha paNDitaH । vaktA dashasahasreShu, dAtA bhavati vA na vA ।। शतेषु जायते शूर, सहस्रेषु च पण्डितः । वक्ता दशसहस्रेषु, दाता भवति वा न वा ॥ śateṣu jāyate śūra, sahasreṣu ca paṇḍitaḥ । vaktā daśasahasreṣu, dātā bhavati vā na vā ॥ (some places it says dAtA lakSheShu jAyate, i.e. a giver is born among 100,000) valor, intelligence, oratory, giving - they are considered rarer and rarer than the previous one. that is the main point of this shloka. what is the significance of this order? valor valor or bravery is executed at the body level. in times of emergency, the decision is even made by the nervous system, doesnt even need permission from the brain. a component of this is at an animal level, the urge to fight and prove the might, turf protection. or to fight injustice. the word for bravery is sAhasa (साहस), which comes from sahasA, all of a sudden. so sAhasa is not an admirable quality most of the time, but invaluable in emergencies, where it can make you climb 5 floors and rescue someone. it is also dangerous if you overestimate your powers out of emotional surge. but still, valor is not everyones cup of tea. hence, one in 100 has valor, the strength and will to fight injustice or do heroic deeds. intelligence this is still a physical thing, in the sense that a lot of it is nature endowed. you are born with the brain capacity so to say, and the infrastructure on which intellect builds. nurture helps a lot in making or losing the synapses, the neural connections, which ultimately define how much of it we are using. even among those born with great brains, many lose out the neural connections simply because they are not given enough stimulation in the early childhood. and brain uses the use it or lose it law. if certain neural connections are not used, they die away. others get reinforced. these are the ones which become our second nature. we dont have to think about these, like eating, walking, etc. yet, intellect is rarer. and if we take paNDita to mean wise as well, then the element of patience, time, experience also comes, which still reduces the numbers. orator/speaker why is this rarer than the wise? one may ask. well, what is meant by a vaktA (वक्ता)? one who can convey his/her ideas effectively. not just one who can speak or talk. but really speak, talk, reach out to the souls of people. shake their thinking, convince them that the sun comes out in night! how many such people do you see around? when they talk, all listen intently! see across the ages, among the celebrities or anyone. the charisma of words to hold the audience captive is rare. to learn is one thing, to understand and be able to teach it, get it across to another properly, without ambiguity or doubt, is totally another. all wise people are not good teachers either. not all swAmIs are good gurus. a swAmI controls himself, a guru teaches others. it needs special skills in handling a student. when hanUmAn finds sItA in la~NkA in rAvaNas garden, he thinks how to speak. if he spoke in chaste saMskRitam (sanskrit) she may not believe him and think it was sorcery of rAvaNa. whenever hanUmAn speaks in rAmAyaNa, it is always filled with wisdom and thought and are very convincing. even rAma listens to his advice. when rAma and lakShmaNa first meet hanUmAn as a human, rAma can not stop praising the beautiful way of his speaking, flawless, poetic, wise... when you see the movie industry, many are involved in the making, few are actors, even fewer are leads that hold a movie just by their screen presence, but among all these, fewer are those who give back, as in charity, social causes etc.! just a crude analogy to our times. giver valor or bravery was at the body level, intellect at the mind level, wisdom over time, but what about giver? one who gives has reached the heart level. s/he has started to identify everyone with oneself, AND started to act upon that realization by giving, helping others. the intelligent may know that one should give, the orator may convince you to give and yet, only when you actually give have you reached the stage of going beyond yourself and stepping in the divinity. but give without ego. what is true giving? sAttvika dAna? we already discussed this - given with a sense of compulsion/duty, to someone who cant pay back, given in proper time, place and to worthy receiver is called true giving. how many of us have so much to spare, yet we dont give much to the needy. we dont even give our full attention to anyone these days! what to say of giving materials to the needy. when we give, we give as a result of our need to be guilt free, rather than the others need. hence, when we dont want to give, we can quickly make excuses for why we should not give. we give what we dont need, not what someone needs. that is why it is said that a true giver? well, may or may not be (born even) in a hundred thousand! be brave. be smart. be wise. give.
Posted on: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:46:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015