...back to the psychoanalyzing skeptics. As is to be expected, rarely do the self-appointed skeptics (who have hijacked the term) turn the looking glass upon their own “coincidence theorist” views and engage in analysis of why it’s so much more comfortable for them to accept official stories and narratives as their base hypothesis, to ignore the incredible amount of both primary sources and well-researched secondary analysis on subjects like mind control, black technology, cultural engineering, academic bias, suppression of evidence, historical cover-ups, etc and to unthinkingly accept authority’s (unfounded) claims to legitimacy.
Posted on: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:52:04 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015