fairtest.org/why-you-can-boycott-testing-without-fear Why You Can Boycott Standardized Tests Without Fear of Federal Penalties to Your School Submitted by fairtest on September 15, 2014 - 8:35pm fairtest on national k-12 national national legislativenews resistance whats new Schools and districts that receive federal Title I funds sometimes claim they will lose funds if parents, students or teachers boycott standardized tests required under No Child Left Behind (NCLB). As far as we know, no school or district anywhere in the country has ever been penalized for failing to test enough (95%) of its students. Parents, students and teachers generally should not fear harmful consequences to their schools due to federal law if parents boycott standardized tests. Here is why: 95% Rule NCLB says that 95% of students must take the test or the school will fail to make “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) and then suffer sanctions. However, this provision is now essentially irrelevant. First, schools that do not receive federal Title I funds are exempt from sanctions under NCLB. Those schools are labeled as not making AYP, but NCLB does not require a state to do anything to them. Second, 41 states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) have waivers from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) that have eliminated the sanctions imposed on most schools that fail to make AYP. The basic message is that in waiver states, a school not in or close to the bottom 5% likely has nothing to fear from a boycott. However, a school that is at or close to the bottom 5% would be advised to proceed with caution – parents may not want to increase the likelihood of severe sanctions (staff firings, turning it into a charter school) by having both very low scores (or, depending on the state, low rates of score increases) and many opt outs. Third, in states without a waiver, every school must now have 100% of its students score “proficient.” As a result, almost all schools are “failing” and face possible sanctions. But if a school is already failing, there is no additional danger from a boycott. In addition, the 95% rule does not pertain to any tests other than reading and math exams mandated by NCLB. Separate tests used to judge teachers in other subjects as well as other state or district-mandated tests are not covered by this requirement. There may be some risk for some schools due to the 95% rule. But for the great majority of schools, including Title I schools, the risk is non-existent or minimal and should not be a reason to avoid boycotts. Loss of Funds The claim that schools will lose funding is true only in a limited way. For states without a waiver: Under NCLB, a school that fails to make AYP for two years must set aside up to 15% of its Title I federal funds to use for transporting volunteer students to a non-failing school. Because nearly all schools are now ‘failing,’ the transfer issue has become irrelevant. If a school does not make AYP for three years, it must put aside up to 15% of its Title I funds for ‘supplemental educational services’ (‘tutoring’). The 15% funds are not available for regular school use. Districts, however, are eligible to run their own SES programs. In a state with a waiver, a “priority” school must set aside 5-15% of its federal Title I and II funding to use in state-approved programs in the school. The money is not ‘lost.’ It generally may be used for various school improvement efforts. Notes and links These comments are generally applicable to all states. However, it is possible, for example, that your state is labeling more than 5% of schools as ‘priority’ (under waivers) or includes non-title I schools under NLCB sanctions (for non-waiver states), though we do not know of such states. In addition, if your state or district has a high school graduation test or requires children to pass a test to be promoted to the next grade, your child likely will be at risk if you boycott. And your state may grade schools in ways that could be affected by boycotts (e.g., get a lower grade, which may or may not carry consequences). The NCLB law is at www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html; specific points include: 95% requirement is at Sec. 1111(a)(2)(I)(2)(ii);* exempt from the sanctions under NCLB is at Sec. 1116(b)(2)(A)(ii). escalating sanctions are specified at Sec. 1116 for schools (b) and districts (c). Briefly, here is what happens with waivers: States with waivers agreed that they would intervene strongly in the lowest-scoring 5% of their schools, labeled “priority” schools. (Another10% are “focus” schools, but consequences are minimal.) States have identified their 5% schools. Schools that make sufficient test score gains will come off the list, while those that do not will remain on. States can choose to intervene in more schools, but to our knowledge they have not. Waivers were issued to most of the states through 2014-15, and states are currently renewing them. If a state loses its waiver, NCLB requirements will again come into force - but almost all the schools will already have failed, making the 95% requirement irrelevant. A brief US Ed. Dept. description of waivers is at ed.gov/sites/default/files/supporting-state-local-progress.pdf. A good discussion of New York’s waiver, testing, opting out and school funding is at nysape.org/if-my-child-refuses-state-tests-will-my-school-lose-funding.html; it includes a ‘worst case’ scenario. FairTest September 2014
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:00:18 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015