from Brian Rourke (Plaintiff) v Peter (Defendant) You be the - TopicsExpress



          

from Brian Rourke (Plaintiff) v Peter (Defendant) You be the Judge... c. Brian Rourke (Plaintiff) due to their incompetency, unsound, irresponsible, unethical, and illegal actions are responsible for the denial of insurance proceeds to 396 unit owners and shattered their dreams of rebuilding. Upon Plaintiffs’ advice and counsel as Attorneys for Grandview, insurance companies’ fire investigators were refused access, when investigators wanted to investigate the boiler room, the source of the fire. Why would an Attorneys and a Judge refused access to fire insurance investigator knowing, that if they are refused access and cannot freely investigate the source of the fire, they cannot settle the claim? It is as if your car was in an accident and you refused to show the insurance company the damaged car, surly you know, that you will not be paid. You be the Judge...
Posted on: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 05:53:55 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015