ha ha ha! shes practically saying that the evidence can show one thing and the judge can still arrive to a different conclusion. fundamental evidence in the judgement of the court of Perugia --There was not such evidence only suspicion and fabricated malice innuendo-- They want to uphold that the judges fabrication and formulation of theory based on absolutely no evidence.-- The omnipotence of a judge and stubbornness of the human mind. ...everybody wants to see the truth found in every case, I think generally human beings want that but people get misled for various reasons and thats why we have forensic science. You need science to take care of disagreements between gut feelings and the science has spoken over and over again in this case. Rudy Guedes DNA in the victims vagina, his finger prints in the room where she was killed, his DNA all over that site. The science is so clear and every test done post conviction has shown that DNA shows that Amanda Knox didnt commit any crime in this case and neither did Raffaele Sollecito so public opinion will change eventually when public opinion examines facts clearly. If someone is guilty of a horrendous crime, and is this dangerous, you dont let them free after four years in prison and let them leave the country. The Hellmans court, the only one to allow independent experts to testify, did because Amanda is innocent. Only in Italia can this travesty take place. ow.ly/CgmZ5
Posted on: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:14:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015