it was most inapproprate for the uganda government to allow such a terrible and despicable thing to happen on the ugandan territory: one of the very few respected countries of africa and the world. one, museveni did himself weigh very heavily on the young m23 combatants in november 2012, when they had captured the congolese easternmost city of goma, and persuaded them to vacate the north-kivu capital city and retreat to their former positions in rutshuru, in exchange for an international recognition of their well-grounded rebellion and an immediate enggement of the kabila government for peace talks. the young men and women retreated in pretty good faith. negotiations began with the kinshasa govmt. the whole of the year 2013 saw the political negotiations unfolding in kampala, albeit desultorily, unde he aegis of the united nations organizations. museveni, kagame ant their international peers clearly noted that towards the concluson of said m23-kabila government peace talks the UNO unleashed an unprecedented belligerence unto the m23 rebels who had been pretty quiet, waiting for the new political dispensation due to issue fro the one year kampala peace talks! the UNO blatantly and viciously violated its essential principle of neutrality in a civil war erupting in a U.N. member state, the d r congo en loccurrence. did museveni, kagame et al lift their little finger to say something awesomely wrong had for the first time happened in the recent history of international laws execution? what are the international relations supposed to be in a complete state of international lawlessness? what does museveni think a posteriori of his inept management of the most recent congolese crisis? ntarugera deo koya rufari international
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:59:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015