ok 1 thing: Our universe may be just one element - one atom, as it were - in an infinite ensemble: a cosmic archipelago. Each universe starts with its own big bang, acquires a distinctive imprint (and its individual physical laws) as it cools, and traces out its own cosmic cycle. Every-time i see a scientist try speak on multiversiality, it appears they are really describing multidimensionality, in in-experienced ways, asif they can snifter it but have not taken enough psychedelics to get a better grip on the neunomenous or other planes of perspective. our universe may be one atom; speculate as u will, not that i dont understand, but how i think it actually is, is that the atomic world IS its own universe and you may know this by the heizenberg principle. Also the heizenberg principle displays un-ordinary nature not knowing how fast an electron travels while being able to pin point it as a point particle, correlates to me as a gate of some sort, i mean a gate way higher dimensionally speaking. each universe stars with its own big bang et etc that next line ; each dimension(s) does appear in my experience to have its own imprintability on the next lower dimension at least as the dimensions are segregated and this is how creation occurs down through the dimensions, such as the 6th dimensional sacred geometrical archytype dimensions imprints onto the 5th dimensional membranic light via 7th dimensional tunnel mathematics, then is charged 4th dimensionally if it is say a thought form. I dont know the pictures are not clear, pieces lay strewn and our maps of hyperspace suck. But i always seem to notice when scientists speak of multiversiality i often see it asif they r speaking on multidimensionality and just dont know it. so i finally just had to speak up about that, incase it helps in the future.
Posted on: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:01:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015