typical thing that most people say and think bad things about it from the first easy social moral instinct .... but i think theres something beyond and girl must have their logical art reasons... as she said... Robertis tells Luxemburger Wort: “If you ignore the context, you could construe this performance as an act of exhibitionism, but what I did was not an impulsive act. “There is a gap in art history, the absent point of view of the object of the gaze. In his realist painting, the painter shows the open legs, but the vagina remains closed. He does not reveal the hole, that is to say, the eye. I am not showing my vagina, but I am revealing what we do not see in the painting, the eye of the vagina, the black hole, this concealed eye, this chasm, which, beyond the flesh, refers to infinity, to the origin of the origin.” “When we look at a picture of a naked female, we’re in a safe place, we’re voyeurs and often happy that our gaze is not being returned. Once the portrayal comes to life, however, we’re dealing with a hell of a lot more. We become awkward, embarrassed and nervous — stripped of the confidence we boasted when we were merely peeping. What is de Robertis saying about the way society looks at women?”
Posted on: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:43:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015