x/So: who uses these rules? The answer is self-evident: the players of the game (of chess) use the rules: its not the case (obviously) that the rules themselves play chess./x No, it is not self-evident that players play chess. The belief that anything acts is the idiocy. Even universal laws do not need action, acting or playing. Involuntary change and motion in the inevitably symbolic or narrative realization of conscious experience consist of regular probabilistic potential-sensation. Feelings of the movement and change of the body immediately tagged to me are coherent, but the cancer is the idea that I am some homunculus moving or changing it. Where am I who does this? Am I the invisible subjective subject ego spirit agent? How is that not homunculus fallacy, circular fallacy, and the problem of induction?
Posted on: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:39:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015