youtube/watch?v=I7jC07xQcuc I have read most of these quotes from the 2 volume set of Pattons letters during and after the war. If only Patton had lived, he would have easily defeated Ike for President and would, most likely, have not waited until his farewell address to warn the nation about the 1% of the 1% that own controlling stocks in the Military Industrial Complex. Those owners are not all Jewish, but there is a disproportionate percentage of MIC stock owners that claim to be Jews. Patton had to die because he would never have allowed the lies we were conditioned to believe without question to be forced upon the world without serious scientific evidence. In a court of law inside the USA, most of the evidence submitted in Nuremberg would never have been accepted as evidence. Not only would the defense be able to object on the basis of hearsay and speculation, but most of those pieces of evidence were not subjected to any cross-referencing. Not to mention that the eyewitness in a US court does not take precedence over actual hard forensic evidence. If you want me to believe the eyewitness accounts supporting what we have, quite literally, been conditioned to accept without question, then I need to see a reality tv show that takes a hundred of the top forensic scientists into modern Poland to search for any hard physical evidence to defend the claims of mass graves, et al. If the forensic evidence, TO ALL NON-BIASED professional forensic pathologists indicates what we have been conditioned since birth to believe without question is factual history, I would willing support that position. However, since it would technically be a crime in Poland to send in 100 of the worlds top forensic pathologists to see if there actually exists evidence to defend the myth, we can only question whether real history fears being investigated with the highest standards of modern science, or if those laws are to protect a myth from being exposed as a myth that remains false-to-facts in relation to the actual forensic evidence. I cant claim to have watched any forensics show since Quincy, M.E., I would love a reality show called CSI: Auschwitz. If the evidence is there, then there should be nothing to fear from a scientific investigation. I would be willing to admit that we have been taught the truth, if there were enough evidence to convince me beyond a shadow of a doubt that would be required in a criminal case in US courts. But, through scrutinizing both secondary sources beginning with 1860s English Cyclopedia, and what would quickly become THE PRIMARY source cited by every secondary source beginning shortly before WW1 (The American Jewish Year Book), there is definitely a shadow of a doubt in my mind that there were even an extra 6 million that could have been killed in 1933. Since I KNOW from studying it that the American Jewish Year Book should replace Jewish with Zionist and that it should never have been considered a credible primary source because of its biases and terribly low standards for scholasticism, there definitely exists a shadow of a doubt that, in the US legal system, is all that is required for acquitting the accused. The only thing that could make that shadow of a doubt disappear would be thorough forensic investigations. Without having that evidence, I must remain the heretic to all of you that havent seriously questioned our conditioning since birth.
Posted on: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:58:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015