youtube/watch?v=xGxFJ5nL9gg Α Β Γ . This is an interesting dialect about actor/comedian/commentators Russell Brand= latest work endeavor into politics, with a friendly review on Newsnight tv show. I had detailed my review, but if you must wist, then skip my self-prideful review and gist look at the interview, I think this guy Brand is like a young Kennedy, and I hope they dont plot to kill him if he offends or launches a campaign that would and will (kind of future and pre-tent viewt) hinder the corporate lobbys current assault on British Parliament. .. ... Jerem Paxton says to Russ Bran Im surprised you can be facetious when youre that angry about it. Retort, ...But Id say that Jerem Paxton makes a valid discrepant review of his act, because theyd both be acting, that Jerem owes Brand a new interview, and in simple gist try to convey the intuitive meaning of say five points in Brands theme of a new governing structure, I mean, that Jerem would real focal on one of these comments, print it and study in reviewt the valid points, and maybe in he next interview, that Jerem could focal on what Brand means when he says that profit leads to deficit and why is this bad, in economic terms (consult a doctor in economics professor or twice, at some college, for a review, redirect with some ideas about constitutional errors in the United States, with corporations having lobbying interest and influence on the government, say by googling Wikipedia and History of Lobbying in the United States then transfer this review to the current even more evil construct in corporate control over the U.S. government based on the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United. My point, if this is to be avoided in Britain, which if it can remain in Great will be required, then what must the people do to shape the government from edging out corporate influence, through the laws/legally (not by violent revolution, but through active peace work), and so that the government of Britain does not descend to an evil if as undercorporate or under corporate control, which is I think a better term than corporate power because they have no power essentially. So essentially, is it could Brand be structuring a rationed dialogue to evade the corporate takeover in Britain, which has evolved to a fatal end in the United States based on a valid and well considered read of the Citizens United case decision from the U.S. Supreme Court gist last week, haha, in 2010. But, clearly, then if there has not yet been a law in Britain that is as evil as Citizens United, and with my intent, placing the utmost emphasis on the concept of evil, as opposite to good and stuff...and given the universal postulate in which the only end of a government is to function purely for the beneficial well being and the good of the people... Then, considering, what is the best way to prevent a similar modern/current corporate takeover/buyout/hijacking/false arrest/act-o-terrorism/scheme/soulselling-dealing/end-o-democracy/next chapter in beginning of a new proto-communist/Stalin ideal in state control (for a Russian example, but gist to make a historical reference), in the government of Britain, which if it intends to be Great, the current government, can maintain that the corporations will be warded out of the government so as to avoid the quagmire of essentially a bad government as is the current standard in the United States, which, haha, if having intended to be better with a functional constitution, has fallen well and far behind Great Britain in terms of, ya know, which subset of elected or appointed in each state has greater heart and soul in the execution of their job, for which theyd be paid many ways in the now and forever, haha
Posted on: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:17:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015