Проблематизация, однако, больше уже не является исключительной собственностью ММК и СМД ): In order to support efforts to more deliberately and systematically identify and challenge the assumptions underlying existing literatures, we suggest the use of problematization as a methodology for generating research questions. By this we do not mean a minor critical scrutiny of a concept or a truth claim, but a more openminded critical inquiry, where the basic assumptions underlying existing literatures are examined and unpacked. Advocating a genuine problematization approach does not mean that a problematizer is ‘a blank slate’ or position-free. A developed pre-understanding is a key feature of any researcher (as an academic and social being), and is brought into play in any intellectual enterprise. Any problematization necessarily takes its point of departure within a specific metatheoretical position (i.e., epistemological and ontological stance: Tsoukas and Knudsen, 2004: Chapter 1) as well as within the cultural framework into which the researcher has been socialized through upbringing, education and work. The ambition is therefore normally not – nor is it typically possible – to totally undo one’s own position; rather, it is to unpack it sufficiently so that some of one’s ordinarily given assumptions are scrutinized and reconsidered in the process of constructing novel research questions. Here reflexivity is key: the careful thinking through of one’s position and how it easily locks the researcher into taken-for-granted assumptions and a view of the world as a set of ‘truths’ (including ‘truths’ offered by CMS perspectives). uk.sagepub/upm-data/64747_Jeanes_Critical_Management.pdf?utm_source=Methodspace&utm_medium=site&utm_content=sample%20chapter&utm_campaign=jeans
Posted on: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:26:01 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015