ا مقال منقول من احد الصفحات الموجودة على الانترنت: الا انه يتكلم باسلوب موضوعي ومنطقي ويشرح حال المالك القديم مقارنة مع الجديد وينوه على عدم العدالة والحالة المضحكة والمجحفة بحق المالك القديم الذي يتقاضى 20 - 50 دولار بالشهر: An Open letter to MP.Ziad Aswad: Since the dawn of time, landlords are seeing their properties being literally confiscated, due to the effect of the unfair and unjust rental law, where contracts are freezed and rental amounts, only symbolically upgraded. For example, an average apartment that can be rented for 600 Dollars per month, is now occupied by the old tenant, for an average varying between 20 and 50 Dollars. The landlord can do nothing about it, and if he wants to evict or remove the tenant, which is only allowed for specific and restrictive reasons mind you, he needs to pay to the tenant, up to 40 percent of the price of his own property. Which is a complete unfair situation, where the landlord, who invested to buy his property or construct it, sees himself dispossessed from it, without compensation, the tenant being due to this law, if not a partner in the property, the real and own owner. With a little ice on the cake for the tenant, who is now the real and effective owner of the property, which is that the landlord has the obligation to maintain and restore the property for the tenant, and furthermore, the landlord is the on who pays the tax on the property. A situation that is worse than the worst communist system of governance. A situation that is totally against our constitution. A real scandal that has to stop. Yet last year, FPM (Free Patriotic Movement) voted on the renewal of this law, and it was provided in the text that the renewal will be for one and last year. The year almost ended and it is time to see what will be done in that regard. What disturbed me last year, is a comment from GMA that the law that was proposed (last year) about the lift of the unfair and unconstitutional rental law, was postponed, because we wanted to avoid being unfair to the tenant.(something like that) Unfair to the tenant? How can anyone be unfair to the tenant, if we give back the property to its rightful owner after being confiscated for more than 30 years!? How about being fair to the owner? Who is going to compensate him for all those years, where he paid taxes and maintenance and restoration, without any return? Who is going to compensate him for having had to either buy or rent a property, in order to live in it himself since his other property has been seized by the tenant? What about his kids? Who is owing to compensate him for having had to either buy or rent a property, in order for his kids to get married and live in? What right does a tenant who has been confiscating a property for over 30 years have, for the law to need to be fair with him? This circus really needs to stop. Enough is enough. Hopefully that the current government, and more specifically FPM, make the one and only right move, and without any compromise of any kind. almalikoon.net
Posted on: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:38:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015