ডাকাতি ও গণহত্যায় বুদ্ধিজীবীদের উস্কানি এবং কলংকিত বাংলাদেশ (৭)নাজী” অধিকৃত বাংলাদেশ ড.ইনায়েত রহিত নামের একজন প্রবাসী বাংলাদেশী বাংলাদেশের বর্তমান চিত্রটি তুলে ধরতে গিয়ে লিখেছেন,“ Bangladesh is going the way that Germany did in 1929-30-31-32-33. Please read the history of the Nazi party. I can see the exact reflection in Bangladesh. I can see Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Herr Ribbentrop, Hermann Goering.......match them to the players in Dhaka.....you will find exact duplicates. They first chased the top Jewish hierarchy, who they blamed for defeat of World War I, and then expanded it to include every Jew...man, woman, child for their misfortune. First they looted their property, banned their clubs; then they went after their blood. Finally it was every Jew...man, woman and child who were to be rounded up and butchered. Blame was spread to include the children, and even unborn children, so Hitler decided on the final solution, so future generations would not be born. When I hear the shrill slogans from Dhaka to kill the children of Razakars, even their grandchildren, and even future generations to come, I shiver.....I get the cold feeling in my spinal cord, I cry....is this what is coming ? Are the followers of Prophet Muhammad going to face the same cruelty that the followers of Prophet Moses faced less than a hundred years ago. Are these new Aryans ( the superior Bakshal race) as ruthless as their compatriots ( Nazis) of a couple of generations ago ? প্রখ্যাত ব্যারিষ্টার Toby M. Cadman গত ৫মার্চ ২০১৩ তারিখে তার সাম্প্রতিক বাংলাদেশ সফরের অভিজ্ঞতার উপর একটি নিবন্ধ লিখেছেন। সে নিবন্ধে তিনি বাংলাদেশী বুদ্ধিজীবীদের একটি চিত্র তুলে ধরেছেন। তিনি আর্ন্তজাতিক মানবতাবিরোধীতা ট্রাইবুনাল (আইসিটি)সর্ম্পকে তিনি লিখেছেন, “All those accused of war crimes must be convicted and duly executed. Nothing less will suffice. One must ask what therefore is the point in a trial where the only acceptable result is execution. One is reminded of the words of Justice Jackson, Chief Prosecutor of the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg who stated: “If you are determined to execute a man in any case there is no occasion for a trial. The world yields no respect to courts that are merely organized to convict. To this point, the Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, has been reported as saying in Parliament that she would talk to the judges to convince them to take the sentiments of the protesters into account in formulating their decisions. It is notable that one of the first judgments issued by the Tribunal referred to the ‘will of the people’ in reaching its decision clearly demonstrating the emotive manner in which these trials are now being conducted. On 28 February 2013, the third accused, Maulana Delwar Hossain Sayedee, was convicted and sentenced to death following a trial that was characterized by prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, witness perjury, witness abduction and a flagrant denial of basic human rights standards. The call for death echoed by the Shahbagh demonstrators has seemingly dictated the course of events unfolding in the Tribunal in an atmosphere where defence witnesses are now too afraid to appear and where the judges have now been swayed by mob, anti-Jamaat sentiment.” The big question is what would have been the response of the Shahbagh demonstrators had Sayedee not received the death sentence. It is clear that the Tribunal Judges were under such pressure to respond to the public calls for blood that, had they not responded as such, it is not inconceivable that it could have been their own blood spilt on Shahbagh.”
Posted on: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:13:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015