王佳琪 you demanded proof so often, but I have the impression you are dishonest and do not even like to get it. Otherwise you would at least have replied to my request of some template with an example of the proof of heliocentrism, that is obviously much simpler to proove then the most complex process known to humankind, evolution. This is no scientific colloqium, so we try to keep things simple. But as Albert Einstein said: Things should be kept as simple as even possible - but not simpler. So the simplest approach - if you are honest and not just tricking us - is you deliver the template of proof of heliocentrism, then I can adapt your proof to evolution, as much as this is even possible. But as long as you refute this rather humble request, I can not take your demand of proof of evolution seriously, since you obviously only try to waste our time and have made up your reply I do not accept this as proof in advance. First of all it is important, that - like evolution - we can not directly observe Earth orbiting Sun by terrestrial telescopes at all. It can only be inferred from observations - like evolution. So either you accept inferrence or you do not - this way denying helicentrism as well. Your choice, Sister Wang! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernican_Revolution
Posted on: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:44:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015