BEN THOMPSON (of Justice for Madeleine Group) writes: Id like to draw your attention to a documentary by Bill Maloney. Bill is an award winning film maker, and a vigorous advocate for the fight against paedophilia. Bill and his family were brought up by the care system of the British establishment, his brothers and sisters all suffered abuse at the hands of those who were supposed to be caring for them. Now you may think, that although this case of child abuse is harrowing it has nothing to do with the Madeleine McCann case, but just take some time to watch this video, and you will find some stark comparisons to the investigation of Madeleine. In this documentary made in 2008 Bill travels to Jersey and investigates the child abuse and possible murders of children in care at the Haute de la Garenne childrens home between 1960 and 1986. Eddie, the cadaver dog that was used in this case and the Madeleine McCann case successfully turned up evidence which was later discredited. The evidence that Eddie led handler Martin Grimes to was confirmed to be human bones by an anthropologist and contained collagen. Now collagen is only present in mammals, the anthropologist stated that the bones found had been fleshed and fresh when burnt and buried, yet later this evidence was discredited and passed off as either animal bone or coconut (which doesnt contain collagen). So Eddies findings were brushed under the carpet. Very much in the same way as the original DNA reports, (which were witnessed and signed by more than one member of the FSS) were said to have found EXACT DNA matches to Madeleine in the areas that Eddie alerted to, only later to be retracted. The final Lowe report on the DNA in the McCann case was the most unusual scientific document I have ever read. What I mean by that is that Lowe doesnt deny that some of the DNA found was a match to Madeleine, he merely suggests he cant be sure of how it got there, it was either Madeleines or it wasnt. How it got there was something that should have been investigated after confirmation. So there we have 3 similarities, missing children, the discrediting of specialist cadaver dog, and a cover up of previously sound evidence, so what other likenesses can be drawn upon? The head police officers in both cases (Goncalo Amaral for Madeleine, and Lenny Harper for Jersey) were also both discredited, and removed from the case. Political interference and an obvious high level cover up swung into action, even when faced with the most obvious and logical accusations of covering things up, politicians just ignored the facts, refused to discuss and put their fingers in their ears. The chief minister of Jersey, Frank Walker stands accused by many of covering the abuse up for unsavoury reasons, as does Gordon Brown for the same reasons in the Madeleine McCann case. But that isnt all......... Bill interviews several local people from Jersey, who refuse to discuss the case and who also deny any wrongdoing, just like some of the more colourful pro McCanns, who also I might add, muddy the waters with the suggestion that cadaver dogs alert to coconut, (yes you look stupid every time you do that Safari Sara, as it is POPPYCOCK, the only person youre fooling is Alfibab, who is still learning that crayons arent food) you have to question the agenda and motives of such people in the face of damning evidence. Whichever way you look at it crimes against children are being covered up all the time, and people are just accepting it, newspapers are hiding it, mainstream tv wont tackle it. Its not a conspiracy theory its a cold fact. Its become a deadly virus, it needs exposing for what it is, and we as a nation need to stand up demand answers, and demand it stops. youtube/watch?v=lq6lJsBz9UY
Posted on: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:29:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015