DEFENDING PHILOSOPHY IN THE HANDS OF SADIQ ABACHA. For those of you that have been finding it difficult to comprehend Sadiq Abachas attempt at sounding Philosophical, or those of you who just cant place its application to reality; well good news, all he said was arrant nonsense. And I will prove it. The three Laws of Logic he used as his premise are very limited in application. Such constants only apply to celestial matters at best, not emotional or behavioural matters. The law of Identity, excluded middle and non contradiction presupposes that A must always be A, not P or V. What that means is that if we write that Sadiq Abacha is Stupid for writing what he wrote to Prof, does that mean that he will always be Stupid? Oh, wait, Yes, he will. Why? Cos A must always be A. Maybe his logic is right after all. Sadiq Abacha is Stupid, unintelligent and mediocre. Oh yes, thats a constant! Olodo Oshi! With all the money they spent on him he still stabbed classes. Ode! Need less to say, since his premise is wrong, his entire rant cant be right. One cant build something on nothing and expect it to stand. It will fall. How about that for logical reasoning ehn? *hangs billboard of Sadiq Abacha is Stupid at Ikeja Round-about* PS. I was going to write something long, like quoting Socates and all, but I figured that it will bore you, youve read Sogunro and Ofilis article, I will just let this be the jara! PSS. I intentionally didnt mention Profs name in this piece. Iyi Baba ju ki ama mentionu oruko won ni iru oro rirun wonyi. Hian!
Posted on: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:37:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015