Darren Wilson has been labeled a liar by supporters of Michael Brown, including attorneys for the family, so called officers of the court who are supposed to rely on evidence and the truth. The following article is excellent at analyzing what the grand jury heard. From this article: what hasn’t been widely discussed is whether the physical evidence confirms or contradicts his (Wilsons) story. Perhaps the reason for this disinterest in the ballistics report, autopsies and other similar information is that for at least some of Brown’s supporters the facts are, apparently, largely irrelevant because Brown is a metaphorical “symbol” of injustice regardless of what actually happened. A related reason may be that working through this information is time-consuming — and thus beyond the capacity of many commentators. In contrast, the grand jury painstakingly heard sworn testimony from more than 60 witnesses, which is now collected in several thousand pages of transcripts. Reviewing these transcripts reveals some important and essentially indisputable facts. And those facts confirm many critical aspects of Wilson’s account.
Posted on: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:09:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015