Drone strikes against an essentially primitive and defenseless population are not an effective tool in modern warfare counter-terrorism and are considered egregiously erroneous. Plus, only a real pussy would be so wicked as to create a form of controlled opposition (eg. Al Qaeda, Taliban, or ISIS) and then construct hi-tech machinery that costs more money than the actual pilot of the UAV (*who listed their previous work-related experience as being a high-scoring gamer on Call of Duty) will ever make in their entire military career. All the while, in their push-button joystick fueled delirium dropping equally expensive Hell Fire missiles on the poor who will never come close to earning the type of money that it would take to effectively engage with any impending threat of aerial invasion. So, who benefits the most?
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:05:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015