EUROPEAN NETWORK OF SCIENTISTS LASHES OUT AT RETRACTION OF THE SERALINI STUDY. The arguments of the journals editor for the retraction, however, violate not only the criteria for retraction to which the journal itself subscribes, but any standards of good science. Worse, the names of the reviewers who came to the conclusion that the paper should be retracted, have not been published. Since the retraction is a wish of many people with links to the GM industry, the suspicion arises that it is a bow of science to industry. ENSSER points out, therefore, that this retraction is a severe blow to the credibility and independence of science, indeed a travesty of science. Jim
Posted on: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:57:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015