Facebook, FaceBook, FB or FBI..? I have to admit openly that I try little experiments sometimes which is allot like what most of you do when you publish a post on anything from religion to humor or just family pictures you value highly and dearly. You believe your friends will see it and encourage your esteem and self worth by liking what you post and thats normal because for many thats what keeps them active on this site. Human nature in sociality is frigid in that obvious movements and the lack of certain movements show themselves to be exactly what they are...no more no less. Often times its not quite what you may expect in one sense, but then in another sense its stereotypically exactly what you should expect. I have one friend that is very outspoken supportively and often times the input is along the same lines as the message, but then there are times that the responses may take the subject matter in a totally different direction or be exaggerated. Everybody has a reason for being Facebook and everyones reasons arent the same sue to our individual takes on what is important to us individually. Whether or not anyone admits it these reasons for being here are called agendas. Some people like to play games because thats what they use as input to a social situation, others like to spread knowledge theyve either accumulated or recently become aware of and want to share that with the world let alone just friends for one reason or another depending on their personal agenda. Honestly sometimes it becomes ludicrous due to repetition of the same messages over and over, but then one must take into consideration that everyone may not have seen or noticed the same post exhibited by yourself last week reappearing on someone elses. More likely than not this is because theyve only recently seen it. Then too some things are interesting to some people some of the time and not so interesting to others most of the time. Then come the niceties where people may simply like what you say because its at least 51% agreeable to their own personal lifestyles, agendas and insights as compared to 49% of the post being clearly redundant, but they will hit the like button anyway because they like the person who published the post regardless of its worth in content other than the worth placed upon it by the person who posted it. Thats where my experimentation comes into play. Ive noticed that I can post something seemingly cheerful or knowledgeable and regardless of how rhetorical it truly is most people bite as compared to things original with tangible content and it seems...seems to be ignored. But when I take a look at the statistics of the post it shows something altogether different. People are actually reading enough to click the link to listen to the content, but nevertheless reluctant to ID themselves by comment or likes. This got me really interested and Im working on getting it down to a science. When I run across certain types of human interactional pulses by the numbers building on graphs and statistical data over time they begin to appear as traits. So in my little diabolical mind as my outspoken friend would put it; I cant help but to dissect it, study it, and see what makes it work. Although theres truly nothing diabolical about this behavior and approach to understanding how the human psyche is affected by certain stimuli someone who may be on another level of understanding research could very well default to base humor and make a remark that takes the dissertation in a direction conversely that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter. Case and point arriving at that conclusion is the result of experimentation along those lines and by the numbers by introducing like stimulus to others across varying social platforms and analyzing the results from as early as 2005 to present. Watching social media interaction over the years tells allot about what types of interjections affect different social environments by degree as well as psychologically and emotionally. I sometimes use my own injections but those of countless others as well. Facebook or FB is only missing one letter to complete an acronym that Ive long suspected it has a direct link to and that is the FBI. While this may sound stupid to the doodlers, far fetched to the layman mindset and somewhat suppositional to the mildly discerning, anyone who knows anything about data transfer, archiving or even recovery already knows that Facebook is a treasure trove of information for profiling and offers locations, emails and phone numbers and even though they may be blocked to public viewing they most certainly would not be inaccessible to government agencies. One of the biggest uses or assets would be scientific in nature. For instance; if there were a need for demographic trends they are readily available by introducing stimulus to Facebook or other social media platforms and simply gauging the varying responses by the demographics input. If per say they needed to know how the public would respond to an upcoming agenda they would simply introduce the stimuli by means of media or news coverage stemming from said agenda and measure response according to the demographics inserted, by race, social standing, political parties etc... If I as a private citizen can get results imagine the results of large government agencies. If there were ever a way to stay on top of social trends social media provides all the data needed to come to viable conclusions long before the unsuspecting public has a clue. Well most of it anyway!
Posted on: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:33:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015