From nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html; This sort of reasoning is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another. Key words: (W)ithout an argument for such a claim. The argument is precedent; There is no logical or intrinsic reason that confiscations must follow registration, but each case study has followed this pattern, from the New York gun confiscation of the 17ØØs under General GAGE to today, in New York, Connecticut, California. The NAzIs, STALINIST Russia and MAOIST China, POL Pots Khmer Rouge- Even bows and arrows (and swords btw) in ancient China. So there is STRONG argument for the use of a slippery slope- Even if said arguments leaves me less than fully happy. pickenssentinel/news/opinion_columns/50726056/No-one-is-coming-for-your-guns--yet
Posted on: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:07:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015