I have touched upon 5 different topic till now and I guess it will be better to summarize and establish some relationship between them. This may help readers to get a better view of the subject. Part 6: In Part 1, we discussed about instinct & emotion and for obvious reasons the intention was to promote emotion over instinct. If anyone has a different view, look forward for a follow on discussion on definition of instinct & emotion in my next post. In Part 2, the discussion was around the reason for human losing emotion day by day. The post was intended to suggest that without reflection of ones own emotion from others, he/she tend to feel it as useless stuff and thus no nurturing is done. So not waiting to decide who is first chicken or egg, we should try to be emotional mirrors for others and that will one side improve our emotional skills as well we will start getting our mirrors to realize emotional ROI (return on investment). Part 3 had 2 sub topics. 1st topic provided some illustrations on what is the pre-requisite state to understand the Objective of life and 2nd topic was suggestive to say that whatever be the objective, it cant be reached alone. So establishing harmony with surrounding living/non-living creatures and nature is essential. Nothing is purpose less and thus existence of every creature and nature is part of the purpose and only when every part is joined, we may get to know the purpose. Here one can find the link between Part 1, 2 and 3 that to set the harmony, we need emotion. Part 4 was to channelize the thought of emotion to right direction and avoid selfish influence of instinct. The examples in this post was suggestive to have the emotion without any need bias and also dont make it restricted by considering lot of practical physical constraints. Thus let the emotion be free flowing without the objective to take steps to put it in action. The moment we start thinking the best possible action in a situation, our logical brain (intelligence) and instincts take over and we dont see the right choice (which is not circumstantial) using our emotional intelligence. It is a right debate one can think of at this point whether there is anything like right choice which is not circumstantial? I will try to explore the idea in one of my later post. I have a hypothesis that there are 3 layers, i) physical layer - where we see every creature, object, incidents as isolated and detached and we only see their physical existence. ii) emotional layer - where we tend to ignore the significance of physical existence and feel more connected to everything using emotional glue. The isolated view sort of starts disappearing as the differences are majorly based on physical identifiers. Example - you and me are not very different when we experience love. :) Ha ha. Intentional spice added here. iii) spiritual layer - where the emotion is so strong that entire universe is connected and appearing to be one entity with purpose known, sort of Nirvana state etc. Part 5 was to encourage the readers to set their hypothesis and progress to know the unknown by experimenting based on the hypothesis and keep optimising the hypothesis.
Posted on: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:57:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015