It is not possible to fairly discuss the issue of Freedom without - TopicsExpress



          

It is not possible to fairly discuss the issue of Freedom without defending or allow those who chose to defend themselves against oppressive governments. Americans celebrate when people in other countries fight for Freedom but call Freedom Fighters at home ‘domestic terrorists, Nut Cases, etc, etc. When you are part of the problem it is hard to be a part of the solution. What is the source of discontent? Because someone accepts that governments have grown too big and ineffective but feeds off of big government, does not prevent others from taking a Stand. Things are bad but will get worse quickly, in part, due to the kind of comments to this article. Some people think that because they are part of the government or because they support or could live with what they may see as minor inconveniences, everyone should. More prisons are not the answer. ‘Tough Love’ will not work. Tanks in the street make America a Banana Republic. What is the solution? Mr. Bundy is on the Right Side of History. The days of $400/hr lawyers are coming to an end as the people take controls of their courts. The system is bankrupted. Women distrust the male dominated legal system and in growing numbers opt to go pro se. The economic down turn is a factor but quite frankly, the people are at the breaking point so the system is breaking as well. Some people think it is all the way broken and others think it cannot be repaired. What is not in dispute is that as more people Awake, they are spreading the gospel and this breeds FEAR in some while the people simply want their governments to be FAIR. ~unknown The article is whats bogus. The courts dont dismiss the cases of these sovereigns because they are overloaded with paperwork. They do so because the court is defrauded. Articles like this are intended to deter people from seeing the truth that all states are in fact sovereign. Which if understood, people would see why governments dont abide by their own laws and statutes. Congress has no legislative jurisdiction within states of the union which are foreign states that are sovereign. To better understand the sovereign movement, Congress only has jurisdiction over anyone that contracts with them wherever they are. Hence Congress instituted franchise that functions as a contract that they can enforce anywhere the contractors are found. Individuals who exercise their common law rights under sovereignty know the statutes and codes better than any public officer, have done years of law study, and are simply reminding public officers of their duties. Sovereigns who get arrested probably referred to statutes and codes in their legal documents, after swearing in an affidavit that they are sovereign, which would result in penalty of perjury. The court has claimed jurisdiction over the individual using source code of the governing system through implied consent. Source: sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/FederalJurisdiction.pdf The Thirteenth Amendment outlaws involuntary servitude EVERYWHERE, including on federal territory. It does NOT and cannot outlaw VOLUNTARY servitude. The only way they can tax your labor without instituting slavery is for YOU to volunteer for public office franchise in the government. Making YOU a public officer. Source: sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DefraudLabor.pdf
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:27:19 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015