Just Ideas, Emile, or On Education or Émile, Or Treatise on Education (French: Émile, ou De l’éducation) is a treatise on the nature of education and on the nature of man written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who considered it to be the “best and most important of all my writings”. Due to a section of the book entitled “Profession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar,” Emile was banned in Paris and Geneva and was publicly burned in 1762, the year of its first publication. During the French Revolution, Emile served as the inspiration for what became a new national system of education. Ask about just solicitations. Just ask first! Chumash Employee Resource Center (CERC) 585 McMurray Road Buellton, CA 93427 recruiter@sycerc Re: Job Follow Up – Serving Position Dear HR, This is a short follow up to an application previously submitted. In early 2004, on the recommendation of Denise Jones, I applied at Chumash’s Willows restaurant for a serving position. I was initially hired for the position. Soon thereafter, however, Chumash found “published black marks” about me – based on San Diego County’s “Bonas” publishing. Based exclusively on its “orders,” Chumash informed me that “corporate policy” forbids it from hiring me. I explained the County’s published information about me is certifiably untrue, which fact is independently verifiable. To my disappointment no independent review was conducted. I omit San Diego County’s “conviction” publishing from all of my applications because it is certifiably untrue – no conviction exists. Indeed, the referenced case was fused to a federal twin; the 9th Circuit formally certified the dismissal of both in 2003: The government will be precluded from retrying the defendant …. We … remand for dismissal … with prejudice. U.S. Attorney Ronald Cheng wasn’t happy about losing, but he had pre-arranged a back to back fed-state double play “just in case.” After losing, he forwarded his four trial notebooks to San Diego D.A. to reuse. It was a gamble. They simply couldn’t risk a “second trial” record - they couldn’t legally reuse any of it, so they arranged to have the Bench get a “conviction” for them. Exhibits A - G provide certified proof. About the “no conviction reality,” this Weaver case excerpt introduces the short transcript here: The judicial change of hats … is head spinning. At any given time it … plays the role of judge, jury, … prosecutor, psychiatrist, … and … advocate. If a service position is or becomes available, I’d much appreciate reconsideration. Kind regards, Cash Joseph Bonas United States v. Bonas, 344 F.3d 945, 948 n.3 (9th. Cir. 2003). People v. Weaver (2004)118 Cal. App. 4th 131.
Posted on: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:36:02 +0000