Rebecca Martin is going to be on Lets Get Started Tuesday from 1-2. Tune in at RadioTribune . Via Jason Nellis On July 3, 2013, Rebecca Blumer purchased a home located at (XXXXX) paying through cashiers check furnished to Alessi & Koenig, agent for Summit Hills Homeowners Association (HOA). Rebecca Blumer conveyed the property in her husband’s name, Jonathan D’Wayne Martin on July 19, 2013 and recorded a deed with the Clark County Recorders office. Rebecca Blumer and Jonathan Martin filed for eviction of the previous owners, but were able to settle amicably outside of court. The judge dismissed the eviction citing the property had already been turned over to the owner, Jonathan Martin. On August 5, 2013, Trustee for First National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), First American Trustee Servicing Solutions (First Am) filed a Notice of Default on the parcel under the previous owner’s names. On August 8, 2013 notice was posted on the door of Mr. Martin’s home informing him of the default. Ms. Blumer called First Am to inform them of the purchase and supply them with a copy of the recorded deed. On or about August 14, 2013, Clark County Constable served Notice of Default and Election to Sell under Deed of Trust by taping notice to the front door of the Property. Ms. Blumer sent another copy of recorded Deed of Trust upon Sale to Defendant FirstAm via electronic mail. On or about August 20,2013, Ms. Blumer requested from FirstAm proof of debt in accordance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. On or about August 30, 2013, Ms. Blumer again requested from FirstAm proof of debt in accordance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act formally known as and codified under 15 USCA §§ 1692(a-p). Mr. Martin does not hold a note or security instrument with Defendant FirstAm, or any financial institution which would grant sale of Property owned by the Mr. Martin in accordance with Nevada Law. On or about November 25, 2013, Notice of Trustee Sale was posted on the front door. Sale of property was set for December 16, 2013 at 10:00a.m. in Clark County. Ms. Blumer and Mr. Martin’s belief that the Trustee Sale fails to meet the guidelines outlines by Nevada State law and is an unlawful foreclosure. On or about November 30, 2013, Notice of Trustee Sale was mailed via certified United States Postal Service addressed to the, Jonathan D’wayne Martin. The notice stated “YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, DATED 5/24/2007. UNLESS YOU TAKE ACTION TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST YOU, YOU SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER.” It further goes on stating “On 12/16/2013 at 10:00 A.M., First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC, as duly appointed Trustee under and pursuant to Deed of Trust recorded 5/30/2007, as instrument No. 20070530-0003444, in book , page , of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of CLARK County, State of Nevada. Executed by: DONNY DICKEY & PEARLIE DICKEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS” On December 16, 2013, First Am sold Mr. Martin’s property back to Fannie Mae for $192.014.60. On December 19, 2013, Seterus, agents for Fannie Mae recorded a fraudulent deed against the property. On December 20, 2013, Remax Agent Corey Geib, who was hired by Fannie Mae to evict Mr. Martin, posted “Notice of new Owner” on the property garage door. Mr. Martin called the number provided and informed them of the illegal sale and that there was a Lis Pendens filed informing of pending lawsuit. He requested no further trespass be made on the property. Mr. Geib reassured no further trespass would be made and Fannie Mae would be informed of the situation. On January 2, 2014, a notice of “3 Day pay or Quit” notice was posted on the front door of the property. Another phone call was made to Mr. Geib’s office to inform them of the trespass and pending lawsuit. Courtney Ortiz, identified herself as the secretary, was informed of the trespass and told to inform her bosses that further action would be taken. Michael Vestuto engaged Mr. Martin in 2 phone calls where he attempted to instigate Mr. Martin to anger. Mr. Martin simply reiterated a posted “No Trespassing Sign” and informed Mr. Vestuto that violators will be shot according to Nevada Law. Mr. Vestuto reassured Mr. Martin that he would in fact trespass again and there wasn’t anything Mr. Martin could do about it. He further promised Mr. Martin that he would not be in his home by the end of the year. On January 10, 2014, Plaintiff Michael Vestuto filed for a temporary protective order on behalf of himself and Courtney Ortiz and Corey Geib. On January 16, 2014 at 11:02:13 AM, Judge William “Bill” Kephart of Judicial Court Department 6 signed and filed an order setting hearing on case number 14PO0054 to be heard on January 30, 2014 at 8:55 AM in courtroom 1A. The Defendants Jonathan Martin and Rebecca Hamm-Blumer were served on January 22, 2014 by Kenneth Ross with the Clark County Constables Office. On January 29, 2014, Corey Geib, Courtney Ortiz and Michael Vestuto were served, by unbiased third party, Jason Nellis, with a motion “opposing protective order and request for judicial review” containing 78 pages which were 12 pages for the motion and 66 pages of evidentiary exhibits detailing the various charges the Defendants, Jonathan Martin and Rebecca Hamm-Blumer, brought against the Plaintiffs Corey Geib, Michael Vestuto and Courtney Ortiz. On January 30, 2014, Jonathan Martin and Rebecca Hamm-Blumer were summonsed to an order setting hearing for case number 14PO0054. The applicants did not appear in court, and according to Chapter 8 Protocol 8-1 the case was dismissed with prejudice due to lack of prosecution on behalf of the plaintiffs, Corey Geib, Courtney Ortiz and Michael Vestuto by Judge Pro Tempo Kurt Harris. On the record, Judge Kurt Harris stated case number 14PO0054 was dismissed and even made sure that Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer would inform Defendant Jonathan Martin, who had been excused to the restroom when the case was called after a very long recess. Judge Harris asked Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer if she had submitted a counter claim. Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer informed the Judge that she did in fact submit a 78 page motion to the court on January 29, 2014 at 11:28:55 AM. Judge Harris stated he did not receive it yet, although it was available for the judge to read prior to the proceedings. Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer asked if he would like an additional copy for him to review then. He refused and stated he would review it and grant my motion when he receives it. On February 3, 2014, Defendants were again summonsed to court under case number 14PO0054 set to be heard on February 7, 2014. On the summons the box marked “Motion Granted” was checked, signed by Judge Kephart and filed on January 31, 2014 at 3:49:08PM. On February 7, 2014 the Plaintiffs accused defendants of picketing their place of business and ultimately graffiti their place of business. Judge Kephart used the previously filed motion as a defense against another motion submitted by the plaintiffs on January 31, 2014 which violates NRS 412.378 (3). Judge Kephart stated multiple times that he had only read 6 pages of the 78 page motion submitted by the defendants on January 29, 2014. Judge Kephart additionally held up what his JEA, Minddie Lloyd had provided him and the bottom part of the 6th page was blank and did not match what was submitted and filed with the court. Judge Kephart also stated he did not believe the defendants due to the way their motion was worded, further leading the Defendants to wonder what Judge Kephart’s JEA had provided him. Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer typed up the motion according to standard procedure and in third person. Judge Kephart further proved the copy held by him was not the true and accurate copy when he asked the defendants “How long have you not been paying your mortgage” informing the defendants that Judge Kephart hadn’t even read the first sentence of the motion that was filed by them. Furthermore, as soon as Defendant Jonathan Martin stepped up to the front of the court, Judge Kephart stated on the record “You look like someone who would do something like this” proving his premeditated bias in the court. Judge Kephart also stated that he was “Glad this case worked out the way it did.” Further stating “You have watched as all of these veterans are fighting for the rights you are trampling all over” completely neglecting the fact that Rebecca Hamm-Blumer is a disabled veteran, which she informed the Judge in the 78 page motion filed on January 29, 2014. This statement also shows the judge’s prior bias before the case was even called or overseen by him. Throughout the preceding, Judge Kephart slandered Rebecca’s name by incorrectly saying her name through various variations such as (Blum-Hammer, Ham Bloom, Bloom Ham, ect.) and made multiple bias statements against the defendants and their witness, which made a statement which was included in the 78 page motion. Multiple times Judge Kephart misquoted laws regarding the case and even stated that the Remax agents had every right to go into the Defendants home because they have a quiet title case pending in the District court overseen by Judge Susan Scann. He granted the protective order Judge Harris had already dismissed with prejudice on what he stated was “Circumstantial evidence at best”. The plaintiffs had only requested a TRO and due to his bias, Judge Kephart approved an extended order against the defendants and their witness out of pure dislike for Defendant Jonathan Martin, as he had stated on the record that he did not like his attitude, when Jonathan was simply smiling. He ordered the plaintiffs to not contact the defendants either, stated the PTO goes both ways.” On February 11, 2014 at 9:47:56 AM, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer filed a motion “Dissolving Protective Order”. Judge Kephart summonsed the defendants for another hearing on February 20, 2014. The order was signed by Judge Kephart and filed on February 12, 2014 at 10:44:46 AM. At the hearing the Defendants had their lawyer, Spencer Judd, present. Judge Kephart had summonsed Spencer Judd into his chambers where he proceeded to try to talk Spencer Judd out of representing his clients, the Defendants Jonathan Martin and Rebecca Hamm-Blumer. He also required Spencer Judd to prove he was retained by his clients and they had in fact paid for him to be there to represent them. Judge Kephart also informed Spencer Judd that he had wanted to hold Jonathan Martin in contempt the previous hearing, which he again stated in the March 24, 2014 hearing. Judge Kephart further asked if Spencer Judd had been retained by their witness Alexander Scholes, which he gave a PTO against without ever summonsing him to court. Judge Kephart approved an extension for the hearing so Spencer Judd could prepare himself with the case, since the defendant had just retained him the day before the hearing. The plaintiffs were not present at that hearing. On March 7, 2014, a status check hearing was conducted. The plaintiffs were present along with the defendants, except Alexander Scholes, which again had not been summonsed, and their counsel, Spencer Judd. At that hearing Judge Kephart denied the defendants motion of double jeopardy and request for dissolution of the protective order and the grounds that the case had already been dismissed due to failure to prosecute. The defendants counsel, Spencer Judd, requested Judge Kephart to recuse himself due to bias and Judge Kephart stated that Mr. Judd needed to write up a motion for that request. That motion was then denied later that week. On March 10, 2014, Judge Kephart signed an order filed by Plaintiff Michael Vestuto. Additionally on March 10, 2014, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s yahoo email was locked out due to suspicious activity, leading the defendants to believe Judge Kephart had tried to break into the email account. Plaintiffs filed another summons for the defendants for “Violation of Restraining order; Perjury of Court” which was filed the summons signed by him on March 10, 2014, by Plaintiff Michael Vestuto on March 7, 2014 at 4:40:49 PM. The defendants were served on March 17, 2014 for the hearing on March 24, 2014. Plaintiff Michael Vestuto made multiple false accusations upon which the Judge entertained. Even a photo where he tried to compare Defendant Jonathan Martin with a completely different person. Judge Kephart stated on the record that Defendant Jonathan Martin just grew out his hair and must be mentally insane if he believes the person in the photo isn’t the Defendant Jonathan Martin. The Defendants have multiple photographs which were uploaded on Facebook and were time-stamped showing Defendant Jonathan Martin had not changed his appearance as the Judge attempted to accuse him of doing. Detective Michael Brewer with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Domestic Violence division lied on the stand stating he phoned 832-493-8907 and spoke with Defendant Jonathan Martin. That is known to be a lie when checked by phone records. He in fact did call Defendant Jonathan Martin but on another phone number, 832-392-3830. Plaintiff Michael Vestuto lied multiple times on the record and made exaggerated claims even citing a farewell to a friend, whom Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer had served with, whom had committed suicide in November 2014 as evidence of involvement with a “gang called Anonymous”. Judge Kephart additionally made false statements regarding what was said on the record by the defendants. The evidence provided for alledged Craigslist Ads “posted to cause annoyance” stated the IP address used to post the ads as “76.2.144.251, which when properly searched leads to an apartment complex named Belle Vita off W. Harmon Ave in Las Vegas Nevada. The email alledged to have been used to post the ads was provided as GuyFawkesLulz@hotmail which has an IP address of 65.55.85.12. The phone number alleged to be linked to the ads was a number that had been disconnected in January due to multiple blocked calls and harassing phone calls, after the realtors obtained the number. It was very apparent that Mr. Vestuto, who testified to the information from Craigslist, does not understand internet protocols or how to accurately track someone’s online activity. Detective Brewer testified that he did not know what an IP address even was. Judge Kephart showed extreme bias in this case when he sentenced Defendant Jonathan Martin to 10 days contempt purely out of spite. Judge Kephart stated that Defendant Jonathan Martin “could serve the time on behalf his wife” Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer, which was not present due to a suicide attempt and her commitment to the VA inpatient mental ward that morning. He stated that Defendant Jonathan Martin could “Be the man in the family.” Even though all the evidence presented was again, Circumstantial and not enough to prove the defendants had anything to do with the actions brought up by the Plaintiffs, Judge Kephart further defended his order by amending it on 4/23/14. The sentencing violates Defendant Jonathan Martin’s civil rights. Additionally, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer was represented by her counsel, Spencer Judd, and did not need to be present at the proceeding. Furthermore, a federal appointment outweighs a civil summons. Judge Kephart continuously slanders Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s name on the record and is a blatant attempt at further disrespect toward the defendants. Since Defendant Jonathan Martin was booked into the Clark County Correctional Facility to serve his unconstitutional sentence of 10 days contempt of court “On behalf of his wife” visitation was not allowed until the last 2 days of the sentence. The arresting officer, Bailiff, James Kinnally, made multiple false statements to Jonathan Martin regarding his wifes attempted suicide, leading him to believe his wife was dead and is why she would not be visiting. The first night of his sentence, Jonathan Martin, upon the belief that his wife was dead, tried to kill himself by cutting his wrist. The jail staff did not provide any medical treatment other than telling him to “Apply Pressure” and placed him on suicide watch. The first 2 days Jonathan was not given any food upon which he could eat due to his extreme food allergies including, Gluten, dairy, poultry, and red meat. His allergies written down were wrong and he was provided food that would have cause extreme bodily harm if consumed by Jonathan Martin. Additionally, Detective Michael Brewer and another unknown officer interrogated Jonathan Martin for 3 days, even after Jonathan Martin verbally requested the presence of his lawyer, Spencer Judd. His lawyer was never called and the interrogations continued against policy and civil rights. This was a blatant attempt to keep Defendant Jonathan Martin isolated away from his family and friends. Detective Brewer even stated to Jonathan that they knew he didn’t do anything and just needed to clear him of any wrong doing. Furthermore, when Defendant Jonathan Martin was able to speak his wife during a scheduled visitation on March 30, 2014 for a total of 1 minute before the connection was interrupted. When Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer requested to file a report against the visitation facility, Officer Redman stated he would arrest Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer if she did not leave the facility immediately. Judge Kephart and his staff have showed extreme bias and corruption of the law in case number 14PO0054. Additionally, Judge Kephart, stated that he later changed his mind about the Plaintiffs not being able to contact the Defendants, since they continuously check up on them online and searched the defendant’s friends and family via social media in mob style harassment. Furthermore, the plaintiffs have made multiple attempts at contacting the defendants via third party, blocked numbers and have been spotted sitting in vehicles parked down the street from the defendant’s home. Plaintiff further damaged Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s vehicle by placing a GPS location device on her car. When the wheel well was pulled back for the placement of the GPS device, it was damaged. The Plaintiffs also slashed the Defendants tires, which was done on purpose to cover up the placement and/or retrieval of the GPS device as stated in an expert witness statement from a mechanic with over 20 years’ experience . The mafia type stalking has driven Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer to attempt suicide on 2 separate occasions, making their actions a felony according to Nevada State Law considering her mental disability. Moreover this type of behavior borders attempted manslaughter due to the continual harassment which drove a mentally unstable individual to attempt to take their own life. Judge Kephart further assaulted Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s mental state by taking away her only caregiver, forcing her mother to make an expensive flight from Kuwait to assist in Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s medical conditions and safety. During that time, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer’s mother had to take off of work in order to be present for her daughter during the time Defendant Jonathan Martin was being held in contempt of court and serving on behalf of another person, violating his fourth amendment rights. Upon research the defendant have learned Defendants are friends with Judge Kephart’s cousin, Devon Ruddell, and have multiple mutual friends on online social media websites, including his son, Matthew Kephart. This is more than enough reason for the Judge to recuse himself, however he refuses. He continues to hold bias toward the defendants and out right refuses to even read their motions or hear their testimony. On March 24, 2014 hearing Judge Kephart stated to Defendant Jonathan Martin “I’m listening to you, don’t rub it too far” after Defendant Jonathan Martin started crying and pleading for the harassment to stop. Defendant Jonathan Martin stated he said thank you to the judge when he gave the defendants a protective order because he thought it would make the harassment from the realtors and Fannie Mae to cease so Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer could live hear life free from fear of physical and mental assault. Moreover, on March 7, 2014, the Judges Judicial Executive Assistant, Minddie Lloyd, upon her seeing Defendant Courtney Ortiz in the courtroom, called out her name, waved and blew a kiss to her. This shows the JEA and the Plaintiffs know each other outside of court and is further reason for Judge Kephart to recuse himself. Additionally, at the same hearing, Plaintiff Michael Vestuto stated on the record that he had sent a video on his cell phone to the judge’s cell phone, proving the Plaintiffs have a personal relationship with the judge outside of court. Any attempt for the defendants to reach the Judge or his JEA was futile, since the calls were never returned or answered. Voicemails were left requesting the transcripts for the January 30, 2014 hearing as well as the February 7, 2014 hearing. On March 24, 2014, Judge Kephart’s assistant and Detective Michael Brewer followed Defendant Jonathan Martin’s friend, Jason Nellis, and demanded he turn over the Defendants cellular phone, which the belongs to Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer and was given to Jason to give back to her. Jason Nellis, only after coaxing and lies furnished by the detective and Judge’s assistant, turned over the phone to Detective Brewer. No warrant was presented and the phone was never turned into evidence, which was verified by Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer on March 28, 2014, after her release from inpatient hold at the Veterans Administration. The phone has since been used to call multiple police and corrections phone numbers. Furthermore, data has been downloaded on the phone daily since the theft of the Defendant’s property. On March 28, 2014, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer filed a report against Detective Brewer with internal affairs at the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and suspended the phone with Verizon Wireless, until the release of Defendant Jonathan Martin from the unconstitutional Contempt of Court charge given to him by Judge Kephart. At the defendants wedding on 4/4/14, the defendants attorney returned the cell phone back to Jonathan. He had gotten the phone back from Detective Brewer, which he had stated, the plaintiffs don’t have a case. On or about March 31, 2014, after being released from the VA mental ward for a suicide attempt, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer and her friend stood outside the courthouse informing citizens of the corruption and bias in case #14PO0054. After being there approximately 30 minutes, three officers of the courthouse came out to speak to Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer. They requested she stop voicing information about the case and requested her to lower the volume of her speech or leave. She informed the officer that she has a first amendment right to assemble and free speech. She also informed the officer that the first amendment did not dictate the volume upon which she uses her free speech rights. This was a barefaced attempt to silence the truth regarding the illegal proceeding being conducted by Judge William “Bill” Kephart. Again on or about April 1, 2014, Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer, along with concerned citizens, personally unknown to the defendant, from the community, stood outside the courthouse informing others of the bias and corruption in case #14PO0054. Judge William “Bill” Kephart came outside the courthouse, and proceeded to seek out Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer. He said “Don’t I have a warrant for you?” Kephart crossed the street as Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer continued to tell him to recuse himself and that he violated her husband’s civil rights. He then dialed a number on his cell phone, then 2 officers proceeded to run toward Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer, in order to attempt to arrest Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer, without a viable warrant. Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer was able to evade the officers in order to continue her freedom of movement unmolested. As Kephart had stated on the bench, he would not go after Defendant Rebecca Hamm-Blumer if she did in fact get committed to the Veterans Administration. The on the spot warrant made by Kephart is another harassment tactic and attempt to silence a witness to the corruption in case #14PO0054. On or about April 6, 2014, Mr. Martin and Ms. Blumer went on their honeymoon to Texas after their wedding on April 4, 2014. Unbeknownst to the Martin’s, since no servicing was completed, Judge Kephart held a court hearing on April 7, 2014. At that hearing he ordered the Lawyer for the Martin’s that if they did not show up by the next day, a bench warrant would be submitted. The Martin’s were unable to attend court since they were out of state in Texas on their honeymoon. During the time they were gone, Metro Police and Constable Kenneth Ross attempted to search the property on three separate occasions in search of the Martin’s stating he had Bench Warrants for Mr. Martin and his wife. The Martin’s house sitters refused all attempts to search the property. They reported that police sat outside in their vehicles every day. On April 14, 2014, a Violation of Restraining Order was signed by Judge Kephart and filed on April 15, 2014. Additionally on April 14, 2014, Judge Kephart “Amended Extended Protection Order against Stalking, Aggravated Stalking of Harassment (NRS 200.591)” and further stated the Martin’s were present for the hearing amending extended protection order. The Martin’s were not present as they were on their honeymoon. On April 17, 2014, Judge Kephart signed an “Amended Order for Punishment of Contempt Committed by Jonathan D’Wayne Martin” and filed with the courts on April 23, 2014. In the amended order stated Mr. Martin already served his contempt order of 10 days. The judge also reaffirms the lack of evidence linking Mr. Martin or his wife to any of the alleged crimes committed against the Remax agents. An additional hearing was set for May 1, 2014, upon which the plaintiffs were not present and was only put on calendar so they could bring more evidence against the Martin’s if they wanted to. No additional evidence was submitted. On three separate occasions during the week of June 9, 2014 through June 13, 2014, LVMPD officers dressed in plain clothes approached the Martin’s residence from their neighbors driveway and side yard with guns drawn and even attempted to open the front door and removed a screen off the front window of the residence. Officers peered over the wall into the back yard. They left multiple dings in the Martin’s front door from where they used a blunt object to knock on the metal door. They rang the doorbell so many times causing the chime to break. On June 18, 2014, LVMPD officers dressed in plain clothes armed with guns driving unmarked Dodge truck rammed the rear end of Rebecca’s car in her driveway as she was pulling in from a trip to the store in an attempt to apprehend Jonathan. The officers did not identify themselves as police or present any badges until after her vehicle was disabled and prevented from continuing her freedom of movement. She asked multiple times if she was free to go or if she was being detained. The police vehicle that had rear-ended her prevented her from moving forward or backwards. No warrant was presented and in fact, the officers stated they could not show the warrant because it was on the computer and the warrant wasn’t for Rebecca, so they couldn’t show her. The officers took Jonathan away to jail where initial court appearance was scheduled for Friday June 20, 2014, but later changed to Monday June 23, 2014, in an attempt to keep Jonathan in jail longer and through the weekend. Throughout the case, Judge Kephart has engaged in ex parte communications with the plaintiffs and with the defendant’s attorney where the defendants were not allowed to be present. During the meeting in his chambers with the defendant’s attorney, Judge Kephart tried to talk their attorney out of representing them. This is a violation of Judge Kepharts oath to remain unbiased and impartial. He has shown a bias toward the defendants, made multiple slanderous statements about the Defendants while court was in session. Judge Kepharts prejudice and corruption has shielded him from properly standing as an unbiased judge and should immediately be removed from his position and disbarred due to his complete lack of knowledge and disregard for the law.
Posted on: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:47:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015