Sanatana Dharma I am all inclusive; yes this is the Eternal way. You cannot grasp me with the mind, only with the open heart that loves all. What can you think of me? Your thought is a specific thing; defined by “this” thought...and in distinguishing “this” one implies a “that”...and with the establishment of “that” one has subsequently excluded everything that is not “this” from the specificity of “this” thoughts awareness; from “this” thought consciousness. I am all inclusive; and you have inadvertently divided me in two. By thinking this, you have divided the all inclusive into a “this” and “that”. The category is “this” is whats being included in consideration and the category “that” is whats being excluded from consideration in ONEs attention. Thinking “this” excludes that”. In this way your cognizing has made exclusions in its attempt to grasp me; in its attempts to grasp my non-duality, my limitlessness, my eternal trans-infinite, superlogical, all inclusive nature. I am all inclusive. I am all things. I am everything equally. Everything; equal. I transcend all categories, I transcend the finite limitations of duality(s), of being half inclusive and half exclusive, half this and half that, of being one thing and not another. I am and I am not. I exist and exist not. I am the category and also its exclusion. I am the sum total of all, indeed I am inclusive of that, and I am transcendent of that and have an identity of being a distinct whole, not only the sum of the parts but also the identity they create. Just as the body can not be called a cell, because the term includes each cell individually but is also inclusive of beings all the cells as a total group. My Identity is not found in “this” nor “that”. I am not “this” nor “that”. I am. All of this I am. I am everything. I am the affirmative and the negative, I am their Summation and their negation, I am the conjunction and the disjunction. Yet, I am more. I am “being. I am knowledge; I include all its objects and subjects. I am all inclusive. Letters, Words, Terms, Labels, Ideas, Concepts, Beliefs, Ideals; all designations contain meaning by being associated as being inclusive of something, being representative of something, by signifying something, by being correspondent to some thing, thinker, process, relationship, method, etc. Each letter, word, thought, establishes for itself an individual identity as distinct from the whole, it implies its own sense of being different from the whole. I am all inclusive; I am the whole. Furthermore, I am all possible distinctions of the whole, their individual identities, and I am their integrating factor, their inclusion into the whole. I am inclusive in my exclusivity. I am exclusive in my inclusivity. Language; its parts, its designations, its expressions, its meanings, its representations, conceptions, its logical arguments, its value, its capacity cannot contain me. I am not bound, conformed, confined, nor contracted to the intellect which makes all these distinctions, divisions, inclusions, exclusions, categorizations, evaluations, quantifications, classifications, labels, interpretations, translations, etc The intellect projects such distinctions on me like a move upon a screen, yet the images and forms of the picture do not make divisions in the screen itself....the divisions are only apparent on the surface; only apparent are: shape and form, image and name, attribute and property, this and that. Phenomenological distinctness doesnt imply an ontological separation. I am all inclusive. As the screen, I contain the whole of all the images, words, names, actions, events, relationships, etc projected onto the screen yet no projection has the quality of being the screen itself. Nothing the intellect projects onto the movie screen of life experience, is the screen itself: yet those projections exist nowhere else than on the screen itself. Without one there would not be the other. It takes both projector and screen to make the movie. “This” possesses a unique value which makes it identifiable from everything else. “This” then possesses specific identities. None of which could not exist with out the “that” to be compared and contrasted with. And that is the method by which we know what a thing is and is not. Subject and environment, part and whole, particular and universal, neither exists without the other. By their distinctions are all things known, by the common source of their being are they unknown. The ego is the one at odds, seeking identity in “this” thereby defining the world as “that”. Not finding a permanent identity in being “this” the ego becomes “that”. By being exclusive, by establishing resistance against inclusions, through opposition, comparison, contracts, through differences does the ego exist, and through those things does it create the perceptions, of a character, of a personality, of a persona, of a life story, of a social reputation, of a unique identity construct. Yet, in being a “this” or “that” there is an incompleteness, a lacking, a partiality that is not wholly impartial. It is always lacking, always incomplete, always of the general nature of unsatisfactoriness, always transient, changing, finite, limited, suffering. Realize that without one this there is no other. Become one without a second. Be all inclusive, all embracing, all experiencing, all knowing, all observing, all aware, all being all. This is the eternal way. The intellect cannot divide or separate the whole, the mind cannot grasp the whole, the ego cannot identify and establish a unique identity as separate from the whole, without there is no other. For this to be, that has to be. When this is that is, when that is this is. In the scope of Dependant originations, all is the aggregate self as the play of consciousness, my own self is the screen upon which and in which it exists. All sense objects are limited, all perceptions are limited, all cognitions are limited, all words, beliefs, conceptions, ideas, etc that are cognized are limited. The aggregate self is finite and limited. It is ever becoming arising, enduring, fading..always changing, it is as temporary as its vanishing illusory distinctions that allow its momentary identity to emerge, remain and then fade away back into the non-distinctiveness from which it arose. In the light of awareness all identities and projections bearing that property or that are labeled by it evaporate like a mirage. Do not therefore seek to establish permanent identity as it is against the eternal way. The way of nature is cooperation not competition. The way of nature is ONE; nature originates in unity and returns to unity and is one coherent unified whole, being both part and parcel of itself. It is holographic. Each part contains the whole, and the whole contains each part. Do not form the ego construct with the content of the world of the senses and their sense objects, do not form the ego construct with the content of the world of the mind, do not form the ego construct with anything in the content of consciousness. All this is the Dependant origination of conditioned phenomenon, all of it arising, staying and leaving, always changing, temporary, momentary, finite, limited, illusory. You are the container of the contents. You are all inclusive, you are the living totality, you are the eternal way. Consciousness contains all things, as one thing. Consciousness is one thing in all things. It is all in one and it is one in all. It is both sides of the coin. Yet its identity is not any of it. That identity is what you are, the ground of Being. That is the highest reality, the ultimate reality, the one without a second. It is all inclusive, changeless, limitless, boundless, infinite, eternal. Consciousness is your essential nature. You are that. Consciousness Being, here, now, present, true, eternal, living, aware, always. You are all inclusive, that is the eternal way to infinite bliss, being, and consciousness.
Posted on: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:27:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015