Share and Like! The Fallacies of Abrahamism Exposed! See: ArmageddonConspiracy.co.uk for more info and be sure to Check out my AOI-Ancient Order of the Illuminati Education Page at Facebook/Anominati or at the friendly URL TheForce10 be sure to LIKE the page if you want subscription updates and you support the cause of a Positive Paradigm Shift to enable a 2nd Enlightenment and Renaissance period for Humanity. ======= The Illuminati’s religion is the most highly developed expression of Gnosticism and is called Illumination (alternatively, Illuminism). Dedicated to the pursuit of enlightenment, it has many parallels with the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. It rejects the Abrahamic religions of faith: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, considering these the work of the “Demiurge”; an inferior, cruel and wicked deity who deludes himself that he is the True God, and who has inflicted endless horrors on humanity. If you wish to judge for yourself how deranged the Demiurge is, you need only read the Old Testament, the story of the Demiurge’s involvement with his “Chosen People”, the Hebrews. You may wonder why the “God of All” entered into an exclusive and partisan Covenant with a tribe in the Middle East several thousand years ago, why he promised them a land (Canaan) that belonged to others, and why he then actively participated with them in a genocidal war against the Canaanites. Even more bizarrely, according to Christian theology, he then despatched all of those Hebrews, whom he had supported so fanatically, to Limbo – the edge of Hell – when they died. They couldn’t go to Heaven because they were indelibly marked by the “Original Sin” of Adam and Eve. Only the atonement provided by the agonising death of God’s “son”, Jesus Christ, could wipe the slate clean and allow the Hebrews to be released from Limbo. But there was a catch. Only those who accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour were eligible for Paradise. Of course, the Chosen People of “God” have almost entirely rejected Jesus Christ. Therefore, from the Christian perspective, nearly all of the Chosen People are now in hell proper. Don’t you find God’s behaviour distinctly odd? Indeed, unbelievable? Don’t alarm bells start ringing? Doesn’t the behaviour of this God sound rather more like what would be expected of Satan? Remember that this same “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, Isaac. Abraham, rather than rejecting this monstrous command, rather than denouncing the creature that gave it as evil incarnate, agreed to butcher his own flesh and blood to demonstrate how slavishly and mindlessly obedient he was – the prototype of all psychopathic, fanatical “believers”. Does God’s command to Abraham sound like something that would ever pass the lips of the True God? We pity you if you think it does because you are surely a creature of the Demiurge and one of the legions of the damned. If, however, you doubt the credentials of the Abrahamic God, you may be receptive to the message of the Illuminati and our future-oriented, rational, scientific, mathematical and dialectical religion of light – Illumination. ======= There’s a catastrophic conceptual error at the heart of the supposed war between good and evil. “God” rewards his followers in heaven, while Satan punishes his followers in hell. How does it make any sense that Satan, who wants to recruit the souls that reject God, should adopt the policy of torturing these same souls rather than embracing them? Imagine how different Abrahamism would be if it was said that Satan liberally rewarded everyone who rejected “God” and that “hell” was full of joy and merriment, of eternal delights. With “Satanists”, no one imagines that they worship Satan in order to be eternally punished by him. Clearly, they worship him because they see him as a better God than “God” and they want to be with him and rewarded by him. It would be perverse and indeed insane if those who follow the Devil expect to be tortured by him. In Abrahamism, the “Devil” is actually an employee of God. He’s in charge of God’s torture chamber and his task is to “test” all souls and see whether they are faithful to God. Those “virtuous” souls that cannot be tempted by Satan go to heaven and those souls that are successfully lured by Satan are then punished by Satan, which seems somewhat ungrateful! Why shouldn’t Satan be completely independent of “God” rather than his torturer and tester? Why shouldn’t Satan reward his followers and punish his enemies, just as “God” does? And, in fact, isn’t that exactly what we see in the real world? Every side offers pleasure to its supporters and pain to its enemies. No side ever says, “We’ll punish you if you reject the other side, our hated enemy.” It’s ridiculous and wholly unnatural. So, what we have is a bizarre system whereby God’s sworn enemy is actually helping God by torturing everyone who rejects God and chooses to come over to his side. Why would he do such a crazy thing? No one ever punishes his own supporters. Do you see what’s really going on? In Abrahamism, “Satan” and “God” are actually one and the same person. Specifically, Satan is God’s Shadow. If you do what God wants, God admits you to paradise. If you don’t do what he wants, his Shadow punishes you in hell. That makes perfect sense, doesn’t it? Consider the Bible. Isn’t the Old Testament all about God’s Shadow (Satan) rather than God himself, while the New Testament is about God rather than his Shadow? The Old Testament God is about power, hate and violence while the New Testament God is about powerlessness, love and peace. Plainly, they cannot be the same God, but they can be God as Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: two opposite aspects of the same God. In this light, the baffling Islamic tale of Abraham and Ishmael suddenly makes perfect sense. The evil version of God orders Abraham to perform human sacrifice, and the good version of God pleads with him not to. What we are encountering is an internal struggle between God’s two sides – good and evil – not between two different beings. Doesn’t the whole of Abrahamism become much more logical if it’s seen as a titanic struggle between a fractured psyche – a schizophrenic God, a lunatic deity? This “God” of course reflects humanity’s own inner conflict between the Freudian id and superego. Abrahamism is about the human psyche and its problems, and this is manifested in the bizarre God of Abrahamism who usually seems more like Satan than God, just as humans are usually cruel and selfish rather than decent and altruistic. If there were a being called God and a polar opposite, independent being called Satan, God would reward his own followers, and punish any of the enemies that he captured, while Satan would do exactly the same in reverse. This produces an entirely different religious picture. “Heaven” is where God rewards his supporters, and he has a torture chamber in it called “hell” where he punishes the supporters of Satan. Exactly the same is true for Satan. He rewards his followers and punishes any of God’s supporters he captures. Doesn’t that provide a 100% demolition of Abrahamism? Even if you are a perfect follower of God, you could end up in the Devil’s torture chamber (if he captures you), rather than God’s heaven. It would make religion totally different if no one were guaranteed a place in heaven for doing God’s bidding; if hell and eternal punishment were still a real possibility no matter how “good” you were. Why shouldn’t Satan capture “good” souls? Why shouldn’t God capture “evil” souls? Of course, Abrahamism is set up in such a way that God cannot punish anyone, only reward them with heaven. Someone else has to do the punishing, hence “Satan”. But if Satan is God’s sworn enemy why would he do God’s punishing for him? Why wouldn’t he reward those who rejected God, exactly as he’d done? They’re on his side. They’re allies, not souls to be punished. Abrahamism promotes a notion that the “good guys” can never punish anyone, but Abrahamism is also based on the eternal punishment of the “bad guys”. So, the logic, or rather illogic, of Abrahamism requires the bad guys to organise their own punishment. But why would they? What’s in it for them? Moreover, the bad guy head honcho is supposed to be the punisher in chief. But why would he punish people who had disobeyed God? Why wouldn’t he have a party with them? Abrahamism is wholly devoid of sense. It uses God’s enemy to do God’s dirty work even though there’s no conceivable reason why he would. It’s God who does the judging and Satan who does the punishing. Why doesn’t God have the guts, honesty and integrity to do his own punishing of those he has judged? It’s God, not Satan, who sends souls to hell, so why should Satan punish them? That’s incomprehensible. They haven’t done anything against him. In fact, they have shown that they share his sacred anti-God cause. Consider how different Abrahamism would look if you could support either God or Satan and be rewarded by either with eternal paradise. There would no longer be any overriding incentive to worship God. People would be faced with a genuine choice. Perhaps Satan would offer a far more enjoyable paradise than God. Abrahamism is entirely predicated on being horrifically punished for disobeying God and, insanely, it’s God’s chief enemy Satan who does the punishing. What if, instead of punishing you, Satan rewarded you with every pleasure conceivable? What if you were actively incentivised for rejecting God? The logic of Abrahamism is that you are rewarded for obeying God and punished for disobeying him. But that all changes if you are instead rewarded for disobeying God. Why wouldn’t Satan reward you? Why would he help out the being (God) he hates more than all others? It’s God that hates the souls that have disobeyed him, not Satan. If anything, Satan loves these souls. The last thing he would do is torture them for rebelling against God (following his own example and leadership). Satan doesn’t punish his “demons and devils” and his fellow fallen angels, so why would he punish “fallen” souls? Abrahamism is a ludicrous, irrational story that people don’t laugh at simply because they have been so heavily brainwashed by it. Abrahamism is like the Spanish Inquisition. The Inquisitors didn’t kill anyone. What they did was judge heretics and find them guilty, then hand them over to the secular arm to do the actual killing and burning. But no rational person can deny that the Inquisitors were morally responsible and accountable for the deaths. The secular arm would have done nothing without the judgment of the Inquisition. Moreover, the secular arm were in complete cahoots with the Inquisition. They were enthusiastic advocates of the work of the Inquisition. With “God”, he passes judgment on souls and then passes them over to be punished, and he gets none other than Satan – his sworn enemy – to carry out the sentence. God is as guilty as the Spanish Inquisition. He’s a monster and torturer claiming that there’s no blood on his hands, and he even gets his enemy to execute his dread sentences for him. If God judges then he himself must punish. Anything else is immoral. Anything else is cowardice. And the very last person the True God would hand over any soul to is Satan. Apparently, 98.7% of the human race are sentenced to hell. Why doesn’t Satan simply make them his army and attack heaven? What we know for sure is that if Satan doesn’t punish anyone then no one else will. Punishing is apparently against God’s religion! ***** “But, if Satan punishes bad people, does that not make him good?” – Anonymous So, if Satan rewards bad people that does make him bad? Here’s the logic table: Satan punishes bad people, so Satan is “good”. Satan rewards bad people, so Satan is “bad”. Satan rewards good people, so Satan is “good”. Satan punishes good people, so Satan is “bad”. Well, which is it? Why on earth would Satan punish people for disobeying “God” when that’s precisely what he did himself? If you hate God, why would you punish everyone else who hates “God”? ***** It’s essential for Abrahamism to deny that you have a choice. After all, if choosing “Satan” over “God” had no adverse consequences, you would then have to seriously ask yourself why you should choose God. You would have to read the respective manifestos of Satan and God and decide which you preferred, and that’s no good to Abrahamism. The tale of the Tree of Knowledge is a classic Abrahamist choice scenario. If you eat the fruit of the tree, you go to hell. If you don’t, you go to heaven. So, logic says you shouldn’t eat the fruit. However, if eating the fruit makes you a God and has zero adverse effects, you’d be insane not to. The Abrahamic test of faith is another classic. If Abraham doesn’t agree to make a human sacrifice of his own son, he has defied “God” and will go to hell. If he agrees to carry out the horrific deed, he goes to heaven. But what if Abraham earns his place in heaven precisely because he refuses to carry out God’s order to murder his son? Abrahamism would collapse if disobeying God was the right thing to do! What Abrahamism is determined to say is that you win if you obey God and lose if you disobey. But what if you win by disobeying God? If that idea were ever to take hold, Abrahamism could not survive. The whole intent of Abrahamism is to rule out the possibility that disobeying God can ever have good outcomes. If it can, Abrahamism is automatically finished. People are Abrahamists because they are terrified of not being Abrahamists. They are petrified of the hellish consequences. If that threat is removed, Abrahamism loses its trump card. Who in their right mind would obey “God” if they didn’t have to, and if they could get to paradise anyway?
Posted on: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 03:21:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015