So in many worlds theories, why is it we are speaking of our decisions creating multiple what-if, possibilities and thus many worlds each playing out the potential option of taking that choice. That line of thinking makes us the original whereas, we may just be the product of a choice made by some other world, however, if it creates many worlds by the potential in each situation for multiple outcomes and a new universe springs up to give that scenario its realisation, it of course has to mean we are the creators of universes, we are creating every person and life form in the universe. Well, absent some control, now we do have hologram theory, which, in many worlds theory stands to good reason, as individuals, we couldnt create energy, nor know the intricacies of all things nor pass on memories so ingrained that no world realises it has just been created. But, a computer program could do this, an advanced simulator requires space for memory, but at each choice juncture, it can run a simulation to see what would have happened, if..... We ourselves may simply be a copy of the original simulations choices, of course then do we any longer create choices that create yet more worlds, or is it only the actual original? We speak in many worlds theory of infinite universe creation, but whilst the numbers would be large, in fact they would not be limitless. Suppose i see a woman in a bar i want to sleep with, my many worlds creatable at this point are, approach, do not approach. Only two worlds can arise, one of which is the world i am in, the woman herself can create a universe by approaching me, but only if that ever was a possibility. You see there is a difference between creation of worlds based on decisions-the whole idea coming into popular consideration through the double slit experiment, suggests not that ALL possibilities exist, but that by observation of one or the other, one or the other exists, therefore, unless i am making a choice with more than one potential outcome, no world is created. Once i approach the woman, then she may decline or accept whatever offer i make, this is the same with anyone, there may be small variants to exact response but essentially there are present limited variables in situations of choice, and limited number of people in history and the future, so this does not give rise to infinite worlds, only a staggering number. However, if the theory is correct and NOT a computer simulation, then there should exist a tell tale sign on a larger scale. If truly energy cannot be created or destroyed, and energy is the requirement (and without energy in some form, what can be created?) then there should be some echo of this, the big bang left evidence (although theoretically it should have been a big expansion not a explosion as the name suggests-ie more akin to a balloons growth as air is blown in by mouth, rather than say pumping 100lbs of air into it in one go) Anyway, so we can speak of the alternate dimensions, but somehow, this ought to leave a ripple, like we can measure energy changes in mutiple incidents on earth, from the motion of a car, which uses combustive energy to create motion, to chemical reactions creating observable energy changes in form. And even, with reference to a balloon again, albeit on a minute scale, air is inhaled altering air flow in the room, the balloon is filled and displaces air around it and then takes up space in a form different to what it was pre inflation. So, are there any clear evidences of energy form changing? Nothing has been found as yet, well, except the expansion of space itself, is the creating of many worlds what is driving the universal expansion? If so, then that implies the initial creation was driven by creation of this universe by others thinking it into existence by choices made. Of course that inevitably leaves us still to question how the first ever universe came into being. And, in a reality that has multiple billions of realities, especially one where the secondary worlds created by the first can also subsequently create, in one of them, there must be a person pondering the whole theory and who has or in time will, realise when they were created and then what will be the outcome of that realisation, when that choice to read one more line, to stay up a little later, leads one being in one universe to realise they were born weeks or hours ago just as their creator DIDNT make whatever choice it was that caused them to realise the same. And somewhere, someone made a choice to study how to cross worlds and eventually they will work out how to. Unless of course, it is all indeed the theorise computer simulation, in which case, that gives reasonable validity to reincarnation and life after death, simply because a program running to learn something, would possibly re animate certain programs and to save space, use characteristics already preprogrammed, rather than occupying more space on the universal hard drive which is being used for the continual creation of other worlds, and as life after death goes, it could be perceptions of the remnants of the individual character as it is not permanently deleted but rather its acquired data is taken and assimilated and the character is either used again or else not, but as with any computer program, even un-installing doesnt even removal all aspects of it, perhaps also an encompassing theory for ghosts? Of course it could very well mean that actual awareness of such would lead to a Matrix moment of awakening and give the character, true self awareness within the program making it capable of manipulating the whole or parts of the program, but i guess that would be like being God, maybe even, a computer simulation could be run to allow a god to perceive itself as the creator. And yet if all is so, then the true god, is it the creator of the simulation, or someone else, or is it all an endless regression with no understandable beginning?
Posted on: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:20:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015