THE DEMOCRACY Our democracy is not a full democracy. Well, thats not surprising, but also cannot be ignored. Two things we disagree on democracy: Brazilian First: Forbid-if disclosure of voting intention polls. If the people didnt have that influence all of the research and had to choose at random and solely by yourself, Im sure, the election results would present more ballots distributed. What happens today is not a choice of the people, properly. What you see is whether candidates can or not keep the preference first intention survey pointed to votes. Is it or isnt it? Most of the campaigns have their results pointed to at the beginning of them. Second: why a candidate has more right to time on TV than others? In a longer view of a particular candidate to the detriment of other favors the p * rra of democracy? By partisan coalitions? But what a partisan coalition has to do with the egalitarian and democratic possibility of someone get elected? This Division of unequal time free electioneering, according to support partisan candidates, only strengthens the strongest. (Oh and here I digress, not just to stimulate the stronger than the unequal division was established? How naïve my...) (Update) Third: what Mr. The people even care to know. I started studying on 88 and finish college in 2003. Never, in all that time had any trace of class that would teach the public functions of elected candidates, or of our obligations towards them (monitoring, billing, etc) (evidently my college was not of political science). I dont know how the curriculum today, but I doubt it has improved. We dont just need more schools, we need a more pragmatic curriculum content, too! What is this democracy where the people dont have a minimal knowledge of the functions that should play the candidate youre electing?
Posted on: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:24:41 +0000