Tell June 13, 2014 at 7:03 pm Did you actually read your Reuters source? “Some say….” “May have…” That’s slanted story telling, babe. Reply Bob Cull June 13, 2014 at 7:34 pm No, Tell, what is slanted is YOUR VERSION of what the Reuters article says and it was not my sole source, genius, I don’t do articles the way that your heroes at Faux News, and the Blaze do, I find the facts rather than just pulling it out of my ass. The original article was much longer before the editor cut it way back and a large proportion of my information came from the Army, or are they not a reliable source to your uneducated mind? There was no one killed in that unit until mid August, a month and a half after Bergdahl disappeared and a full month after the search for him had ended. None of the men who were killed were searching for him, they were all on other missions which had nothing to do with him. As for your BS about “Some say….” “May have…” there is not one instance of that being said in the Reuters article. The closest thing to that is “several soldiers in his unit say the quest to locate him never really ended, and that it was an element of every mission they undertook.” In other words the only place your false claim has any support is where it supports what you want to believe is true — so yes, I guess we will concede that part of the article is slanted, based on a bias AGAINST Bergdahl, a mentally disturbed man who should never have been allowed to enlist since he had already been discharged from another branch of the service due to his emotional instability.
Posted on: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:39:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015