The three Stooges, time is near: Gray Davis - Obligation of Contracts Misprison Jerry Brown, traiter - 10th Amendment Treason Arnold Swartzeneger - double jeopardy Treason John Chiang - Mary Yee, I have many instances of "Tax Treason" by U.S. Postal Roads RICO Racquet from you weeds you - personally. Kidnapping federal citizens under false colors of "County" authority, by Jurisdiction fraud 101. Back to movies, this "BANE" guy scares me: youtube/watch?v=5yo-JynIjws Bane, does he a plan or something? youtube/watch?v=eWTE6EZbPSM February 27, 2013 Fort MacAurthur Angeles Gate Park 3602S Gaffey Street San Pedro, CA 90731 Re: 1st, 2nd and 3rd Class Citizenship Contracts Dear Chief Executive Mayors, This explains that only federal common law jurisdiction governs “Bonas’ group” in our triple caste body of law system: A) Federal 1st Class Citizen Common Law (U.S. Attorneys); B) Federal 2nd Class Statutory Law (U.S. Attorneys Act); and C) City-County State’s 2nd - 3rd Class Bodies (DA County Actors). I. Background – Triaged Citizenship Classes 1st, 2nd and 3rd degrees of citizenship bodies are advanced for money by “contract” capers. Every 2nd and 3rd class “law bodies” are “declared facially illegal to act upon”: 1. For money/control agreements; 2. To get money from federal citizens; 3. That affects people’s commerce life; and 4. Leaving people with less cash to spend in life. "Every [citizenship] contract … or conspiracy, in restraint of … commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal." Only federal common law, grafted into Article III of America’s Constitution, governs first class “privileged and immune” citizens. There is extensive confusion about this splintering of Americans. Hostile to reality, local DAs, sheriffs, city attorneys and hills are responsible for the confusion, which they advance through reams of propaganda: There is no room in our … government for the assertion of state power in hostility to the authorized exercise of Federal power." Enormous sums are involved in all local and state government’s “people commerce” business. That’s why it has been set up as it is. This aims to clarify. i. Federal District Born – 1st Class Common Laws American’s federal benches switch between two different “bodies of law” hats. The first and only “law hat” federal benches have jurisdiction to entertain is the body of law that is required learning at every accredited law school in the country - America’s Constitutional law, which common law systems are grafted into. It also consists of statutes certified with some “necessary and proper clause” qualification. America’s Supreme Court explained this first class “hat”: [W]e have in this country … two national governments; one … maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions …. Federal common law was imported from the old English system. Legitimate federal jurisdiction over “a person” exists only where one sues and/or is sued in a “real person” capacity. The formal indicator on this central point is spelling - proper English versus capitalized names. The heading marks 1st or 2nd class federal citizen processes. ii. Federal Statutory or 2nd Class Laws The second “law hat” federal benches entertain is the body of both statutory and state constitutional law that operates outside of America’s constitution. This body of law is not required learning for any born American or alien seeking citizenship, is not “supremacy compliant, not article III common law and “not necessary-proper” qualified. This body of “law” exists entirely outside of constitutional constrains. America’s Supreme Court likewise explained this “second class hat”: [W]e have … two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other [foreign] nations … are accustomed to exercise. Acting beyond legitimate, limited powers granted legislatures manufactured a body of law that characterizes born Americans as “incorporated citizens or ‘fictitious capitalized name people’.” This “2nd class” body consists of a matrix of statutes that are either not necessary-proper qualified or already handled by flexible common laws. To illustrate, the common law of “assault” specifically addresses situations where one places another in reasonable fear of immediate physical injury. 1. Assault - (Common Law) Assault: “The threat or use of force on another that causes one to feel reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact: the act of putting one in reasonable fear or apprehension of an immediate battery by means of an act amounting to an attempt or threat to commit a battery. An attempt to commit battery; the act requires specific intent to cause physical injury.” 2. “Assault” - A “Threat” - Statute One 2nd class federal statute that mirrors common assault is 18 U.S.C. §875(c): Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap … or … injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. No derivative of assault called “threat” statute is necessary to handle a threat by common law assault crime. Federal courts are expressly delegated the power to exercise jurisdiction over such matters. They are not, however, granted power to entertain such redundant statutes. This is a classic example of “2nd class citizen statute” law. When some pro decides to use the “threat-assault” statute over basic assault it is a decision to target a “2nd class” subject – no legitimate power to do so exists: We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the Government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. iii. County-States’ 3rd Class Bodies (TP) 3rd Class citizen law, to which most are unequally subject, is crafted by state and local actors. This body is not required learning at any citizen educational forum. Indeed, most of paper either conflicts and overrides supremacy orders or mirrors common law. This group of so called law is represented to be “compliant with” America’s Constitution when it transparently is not. American “power” to make, execute and interpret triple clusters of law is not a “power” any state retained in joining America. Sticking with “assault knock offs,” which are often misused in “no actual harm” or “pre-crime situations, California’s P.C. 422(a) illustrates the triple redundancy: 1. 422(a) “Assault-Threat Copy Cat - Elements: A) Words threatening to commit a crime; B) That would result in death or great bodily injury; C) With specific intent the words be taken as very real; D) Which on its face and under the immediate circumstances; E) Is so unequivocal, unconditional and immediate as to convey; F) A gravity of purpose and immediate prospect of a real execution; and G) Causing one to reasonably be in sustained fear of safety. II. Local Federal District – Choice and Consent District common law is required instruction at all education institutions. State and county (“third class citizen law) is not. A view of required versus optional (and not qualified paper law) pins the reality that Mayors have installed a foreign (or alien to America) government at the local level: It is quite a … thing to say that [any] Congress [or DA or Sheriff or Bench] may, if it so elects, proceed outside of the Constitution. i. “Class” Choice and Informed Consent The reality that 2nd and 3rd class bodies of law are presently in place not subject to dispute, “There are … two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District ….” The choice is available to some, who avail themselves of the benefits of American Citizenship. With an eye on expected and projected total revenues (unit person by unit person), local and state governments do not make this choice available to most. That’s why most citizen lawyers and lay alike don’t even know what their “rights, privileges and immunities” as Americans are. The words “citizen duties” are used when something is wanted (paying time on jury duty, paying taxes and so forth,). Conversely, the words “citizen rights, privileges and immunities” are largely avoided – in house and publicly. “[A] citizen of the United …, who is not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the Constitution." “[A] person may be a citizen of the United States and yet being homeless—a nomad—be not … identifiable as a citizen of any … state.” Nomad Transient Homeless Elite JD III. Domicile versus Resident “Home-base” Important citizenship (and the law of jurisdiction over a person) is based in part on the distinction between “domicile” and “residence.” Domicile is one’s “home-base.” Distinguished, “residence” is where one lives but does not view as “home base”: Domicile: The place at which a person has been physically present and … regards as home; a person’s true, fixed, principal, and permanent home, to which that person intends to return and remain even though currently residing elsewhere. Residence: The act or fact of living in a given place for some time. The place where one actually lives but does not view as home-base - domicile. One may thus keep more than one “residence” at ay given point in time, but one can legally keep only one “domicile.” Sometimes the two terms are used synonymously by those who do not understand “citizen jurisdiction options” involved in definitions. The legal significance of domicile is simple: My home-base (or domicile for jurisdiction purposes) is the Central District of California (specifically Solvang). It is not Santa Barbara County’s franchise government, nor is it the franchise City of Solvang. Accordingly, as a federal citizen of the united States, limited jurisdiction over me (relegated to federal courts under common only) travels with me wherever I go - to any city or county in any state that is United. It means no local Sheriff, Police, CHPs or any other state agent has any jurisdiction over me for any purpose – apart from, perhaps, making some citizen arrest or otherwise reporting about me to the FBI, U.S. Marshal, e.g. It’s kind of like full court diplomatic immunity shield from any county-state law - from sales and income tax to everything else that falls under any states’ “Constitution.” IV. “Removal” - Fed-State “Foreign” Relations A prime example of how federal agents have dealt with county-state’s exercise of the same “power over people” (by different statutes and procedure) is the “removal” statute - 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a): A suit filed in state court may be removed to federal court if the federal court would have had original subject matter jurisdiction over that suit. This federal tool is used to secure federal “rights” in a federal “forum” when one is haled to answer as a third class citizen, which is the essence of all state court business. V. There is No 11th Amendment Immunity America’s high court explained that municipalities have no immunity from “colors of authority” liability (1983) for constitutional violations – and they many not assert any good faith of its agents or officers as a defense: "The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of [local] governmental authority is assured that he will be compensated for his injury." VI. Closing – Local Contract Governments The “U.S. Postal Roads” Sheriffs like Bill Gore and Lee Baca’s armed forces drive on daily are all situated in some federal district. Thus, all case they or D.A. bring “for money” - under anything other than united common law - are “declared illegal.” Some limply argue that no federal common law exists. It “existed” long before most “states” existed – roughly eighty years before the territory of California was converted into a “reservation like” “dependent sovereign.” It is grafted into America by reference to English “wheat” law. Thank you for erasing all traces of “divided citizenships” from public records. Kind regards, Lucretia Eldredge c/0 Gary Joseph Bonas II Service List Fort MacAurthur Richter Concrete Corp. v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc., 547 F. Supp. 893, 917 (S.D. Ohio 1981). 15 U.S.C. Section 1, The Sherman Act. National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833, 866 (1976). Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 92 (Abridged 8th Edition 2005). McCulloch v. Maryland - 17 U.S. 316 (1819). Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155] [48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]. Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823 (1949), citing D.C., Pannill v. Roanoke Times Co., 252 F. 910, 914. Du Vernay v. Ledbetter, 61 So.2d 573 (1952), citing Pannill v. Roanoke Times Co., D. C., 252 F. 910. Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 413 (Abridged 8th Edition 2005). Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 1084 (Abridged 8th Edition 2005). 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams,482 U.S. 386, 107 S.Ct. 2425, 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980).
Posted on: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:18:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015