There are many varieties of magic, not all of which include the idea that magical spell-casting is efficacious or morally sound. Even in those types of magic where spell-work is taught, there is no general agreement on what magic is, or what it is not. A theory that accounts for the form of magic called natural magic is that certain objects, including but not limited to natural curios such as roots, herbs, minerals, and animal parts, have within them a certain a-causal link to some realm of human endeavour, often by virtue of their shape, colour, size, or scent. In natural magic, the visible link between a curios physical attributes and its magical symbolism is called the Doctrine of Signatures. Thus, to give two examples of the Doctrine of Signatures, violet leaves, which look like hearts, are used in love magic, and lodestones, which are natural magnetic rocks, are used to draw wealth, love, or luck to the holder. These operations may be carried out with or without reference to religious entities (gods, spirits, saints). An overlapping, but actually slightly different form of magic involves human-made artifacts -- amulets, lucky charms, talismans, and the like. This form of magic is generally called talismanic magic. Talismans can be made by the magician him or herself but are often prepared for clients by a conjurer, craft-worker, or jeweller. If they are commercially purchases, they must be empowered, fixed, or consecrated for use, and once prepared, they are said to work on behalf of the mage. A third popular form of magic is called will-based or thelemic magic. Its practitioners tend to disdain natural magic, although they may use talismanic magic as a way to focus their will-power. Magicians of this type also have been know to say that performing magical spells is unimportant to them because simply visualizing the performance of the spell is sufficient to strengthen their will-power and this bring about the magical results they desire. Each culture (or social sub-culture) seems to have its own rules regarding the workings of magic, but many of these rules are found in more than one culture. For instance, ritual cleaning and bathing occurs in the magic of most cultures, including urban ceremonial magick (with a k) and Sicilian folk magic (without a k). But some forms of ritual or rule are not as widespread. For example, footprint or footstep magic (performing magical operations on others through use of their footprints, shoes, or by scattering material where they will step on it) is typically an African magical custom, which is found also in African-American magical practice. For most folk-magicians, symbology is very important. Faith, technical knowledge, precognitive intent, and emotional power fuel belief and confidence in the effects of a culturally appropriate symbological working. However, once the rules of each system of magic are internalized by the practitioner, a great deal of improvisation may be done for any given ritual or magical job of work. The mark of a good magician in his or hr own school of magic is his or her ability -- to borrow an analogy from music -- to seamlessly improvise a tune within the chord structure of the system being used. Perhaps magic seems too good to be true to you because you have an inflated idea about the practice of magic from the perspective of movies or tv shows -- but in actuality, magic is not a cure-all for problems. Rather, it is a way of working with subtle energies, with the natural virtues of plants and stones, with spirits, with -- well, with as many different forms of non-ordinary reality as there are schools of magic, i suppose! Sometimes spells work, sometimes they do not. Sometimes prayers produce results. Sometimes they do not. Nothing is infallible. Death is inevitable. What we do with our lives is a matter of as much choice as we can muster, given the limitations of genetics, circumstance, and happenstance. Some of us find pleasure and fulfilment in the practice of religion, magic, occultism, and/or mysticism. Others of us do not. You have wandered into a group of people who practice magic -- but how each of us *defines* magic is left to the individual. Now, there is a further wrinkle with respect to the question of whether magic *always* works, and that is the matter of belief. You may have read in a book or heard in a movie that magic only works if you believe it works or spells only have an effect on people who believe that magic can affect them. These statements and others like them are often used to rationalize away the fear that one has been magically attacked. One says, in effect, magic can only harm me if i believe in it. The it only works if you believe it works defense against magical harm is generally invoked by folks who think that the only metaphysical concept to which they need pay heed is their own consciousness. One logical offshoot of this form of solipsism is something i call belief in the consent of the victim -- a mental gymnastics move whereby a solipsist can legitimize unfortunate events. Belief in the consent of the victim is sometimes expressed as, If it happened to me, i must have allowed it to happen or subconsciously willed it to happen to me. In New Age circles, belief in the consent of the victim gives rise to ideations such as, The reason my house was destroyed in that landslide was because i subconsciously wished to learn a lesson from that event, or I would not have been born a paraplegic if on some level i did not desire to experience life as a cripple. Solipsism of this sort can be theoretically intriguing, but realistically it is untenable to me, because i see practical evidence all around me that things happen to people that are not within the control of the people to which they happen. Thus, the invocation of belief in the consent of the victim as a presumed law of magic seems foolish and weak and unrealistic to me. This does not mean that i believe that magic *always* works -- it merely explains why i do not explain away any failures of magical spells by invoking the illogical idea that magic only works if you believe it works. ---Simon Mitchell
Posted on: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:26:57 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015