Your Boy. He has full command of real time information - TopicsExpress



          

Your Boy. He has full command of real time information dissemination. Your Media Boy, Mr. Obama. Say it, or part of it - live. Whats the problem with that? Just a little bit of fact based truth, whats the problem there? Remember? Remember hat thing called Truth. Its a hard five letter word to comprehend, especially for all big media: “Our task, of course, is to resolve the issue by constitutional measurement, free of emotion, and of predilection. We seek earnestly to do this, and, because we do, we have inquired into, and in this opinion place some emphasis upon, … legal history and what that history reveals about mans attitudes toward … procedure [and training] over the centuries. We bear in mind, too, Mr. Justice Holmes admonition in his now-vindicated dissent in Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45, 76 (1905): • The Constitution is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions … novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether county-police state made up statutes … conflict with the Constitution … United …. Roe et al. v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Roe et al. v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). https://youtube/watch?v=dFkbSAH7yb4 My State of the Union is comming. Alioto-Scarpulla DA Guido’s Milk Gig Barela, et al. v. Ralphs Grocery Company, et al. (co-counsel) Settlement: $13.8 million class action case involving an alleged agreement among five major grocery chains to fix and maintain retail prices of milk sold in Southern California. Ralphs Grocery Co • 10-K • For 1/30/94 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDING In December 1992, three California state antitrust class action suits were commenced in Los Angeles Superior Court against Ralphs and other major supermarket chains located in Southern California, alleging that they conspired to refrain from competing in and to fix the price of fluid milk above competitive prices. Specifically, class actions were commenced by Diane Barela and Neila Ross, Ron Moliare and Paul C. Pfeifle on December 7, December 14, and December 23, 1992 respectively. Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. 10-K405 SEC Filing, 12/23/1998. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTD.) On May 2, 1993, the Company was named as a defendant along with all of the other major supermarket chains located in the Los Angeles County area in a class action complaint filed in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles, California, alleging among other things that the milk pricing policies of each of the defendants violate certain antitrust laws and regulations under California law. In this class action lawsuit, Barela et al. v. Ralphs Grocery Co. et al., plaintiffs sought unspecified damages. The Company has recently entered into a settlement agreement of this case which settlement does not involve payment of monetary damages and is currently being processed through the courts for approval. Such settlement will not have an adverse material effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company. Fred Meyer Inc • 10-K405 • For 1/31/98 Item 3. Legal Proceedings. In December 1992, three California state antitrust class action suits were commenced in Los Angeles Superior Court against Ralphs Grocery Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ralphs/Food 4 Less (Ralphs) and other major supermarket chains located in Southern California, alleging that they conspired to refrain from competing in the retail market for fluid milk and to fix the retail price of fluid milk above competitive prices. Specifically, class actions were commenced by Diane Barela and Neila Ross, Ron Moliare and Paul C. Pfeifle on December 7, December 14 and December 23, 1992, respectively. A class has been certified consisting of all purchasers of milk in Los Angeles from December 7, 1988. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages. All defendants in the actions, including Ralphs, have reached tentative settlement agreements, and certain of the settlements have been approved by the trial court. Ralphs is in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement in the case. On September 13, 1996 a class action lawsuit titled McCampbell, et al. v. Ralphs Grocery Company, et al. was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, against Ralphs and two other grocery store chains operating in the Southern California area. The complaint alleges, among other things, that Ralphs and others conspired to fix the retail price of eggs in Southern California. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants actions violate provisions of the California Cartwright Act and constitute unfair competition. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages they purport to have sustained as a result of the defendants alleged actions, which damages may be trebled under the applicable statute, and an injunction from future actions in restraint of trade and unfair competition. Discovery has commenced and the action has been certified as a class. Ralphs intends to defend this action vigorously and Ralphs has filed an answer to the complaint denying the plaintiffs allegations and setting forth several defenses. THE KROGER CO. FORM 10-Q May 22, 1999 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In December 1992, three California state antitrust class action suits were commenced in Los Angeles Superior Court against Ralphs/Food 4 Less and other major supermarket chains located in Southern California, alleging that they conspired to refrain from competing in the retail market for fluid milk and to fix the retail price of fluid milk above competitive prices. Specifically, class actions were commenced by Diane Barela and Neila Ross, Ron Moliare and Paul C. Pfeifle on December 7, December 14 and December 23, 1992, respectively. A class has been certified consisting of all purchasers of milk in Los Angeles from December 7, 1988. The defendants in the actions, including Ralphs/Food 4 Less, have reached tentative settlement agreements, and settlements are in the process of being approved by the trial court. On September 13, 1996, a class action lawsuit titled McCampbell, et al. v. Ralphs Grocery Company, et al. was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, against Ralphs/Food 4 Less and two other grocery store chains operating in the Southern California area. The complaint alleges, among other things, that Ralphs/Food 4 Less and others conspired to fix the retail price of eggs in Southern California.
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:56:57 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015